Mishmash, Religionism and Theological Literacy: an Appreciation and Critique of Trevor Cooling's Hermeneutical Programme

Abstract

Trevor Cooling's attempt to transcend the terms of the current debate surrounding the SCAA Model Syllabuses is given a critical analysis. The charges of religionism directed towards the syllabuses by those holding a ‘generic’ view of religion are outlined, as is the defence offered by those advocating a ‘nominalist’ understanding of religion that they avoid a religious mishmash. Cooling's theoretical approach is described, as is his practical hermeneutical model of ‘concept cracking’. It is suggested that Cooling does indeed offer the possibility of a way forward beyond the impasse of the current debate, provided significant revisions are made to his hermeneutical programme.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Andrew Wright

Dr Andrew Wright is Lecturer in Theological and Religious Education at King's College London.