The two available mechanisms for antiphase-boundary tube formation under single-slip conditions are compared. Some of the assumptions involved such as the driving force for limited fast climb at jogs and the conditions for the transformation of Kear-Wilsdorf locks into dipoles are re-examined. Various implications of the two mechanisms are analysed and they are also compared with experimental observations in L1 2 alloys. It is shown that the trailing of APB tubes by climb-relaxed jogs offers explanations of current microstructural features that are often less constraining than the bypassing of Kear-Wilsdorf locks and subsequent dipolar cross-slip annihilation. Evidence is also provided in support of the generation of APB tubes by direct cross-slip annihilation confirming a manoeuvre originally proposed for B2 alloys.
Kear-Wilsdorf locks and the generation of antiphase-boundary tubes in L1 2 alloys
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.