Abstract
The results of a recent study and explanation of the magnetism of UCu2Ge2 (Roy and Coles 1991, Phil Mag. B, 64, 741) do not agree with some previous results, notably with neutron diffraction data. Contradictory results on the magnetism of UCu2Ge2 are summarized and discussed. The absence or appearance of a low-temperature antiferromagnetic phase in this ferromagnet is ascribed to different annealing conditions that may give variations in stoichiometry, a view supported by neutron studies of the magnetic phase diagram of the U(Ni1-xCux)2Ge2 solid Solutions.