Size matters: what influences medical students’ choice of study site?

Abstract

Background: The University of British Columbia, Canada doubled its class intake in 2004, creating, in addition to its main metropolitan campus, 2 distributed campuses, one in a medium sized island city, and the other in a small geographically isolated northern city. Our admission process attempts to identify students more suitable for education in our northern, rural site. Students also indicate their preferred site. Little is known about what influences student choice when they have more than one campus to choose from at a single medical school.

Aim: To understand what influences students’ preference of study site in a single medical school with 3 separate campuses, one with a rural mission.

Methods: We used qualitative methodology to examine what influenced student choice of study site. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with students at all three sites (n = 37). Iterative and independent coding and analysis took place to corroborate research findings.

Results: The primary theme was size of class and community. Some students viewed a larger class size and larger study and practice community as advantages, others viewed a smaller class size and smaller study and practice community as important. Additional themes were perceptions of quality of education, relationships, and lifestyle. These were related to the larger theme of class and community size and overlapped. Students articulated advantages and disadvantages of each site, and dynamic tensions in their choice of sites. Close relationships and educational experiences were emphasized at the smaller regional sites. Greater access to medical and educational specialists and the diversity offered by a larger, more anonymous class, patient case-mix, and community were emphasized at the originating and largest site. Partner and family – trumps – could overrule preferred site choices.

Conclusion: Early and comprehensive descriptions of the differences between sites for students and their partners is needed to help truly informed choices.

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Tanis Mihalynuk

DR MIHALYNUK is Program Research Leader, Nutrition, Alberta Cancer Board. At the time the research was conducted, she was a postdoctoral research associate, Faculty of Medicine, Undergraduate Medical Education, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, Canada.

David Snadden

DR SNADDEN is Vice Provost Medicine and Professor, Northern Medical Program, University of Northern British Columbia (UNBC), Prince George, Canada and Associate Dean, Northern Medical Program and Affiliate Professor, Department of Family Practice, UBC.

Joanna Bates

DR BATES is Senior Associate Dean, Education, Faculty of Medicine, and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Practice, UBC.

Ian Scott

DR SCOTT is Director of Undergraduate Family Practice Programs, and Associate Professor in the Department of Family Practice, UBC.

Vera Frinton

DR FRINTON is a Clinical Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UBC and.was Associate Dean, Admissions MD Undergraduate Program at the time this research was carried out.

Galt Wilson

DR WILSON is Year III/IV Clerkship Director, Northern Medical Program, UNBC and Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Practice, UBC.