Comparison of ambulatory and inpatient experiences in five specialties

Abstract

This study compared medical student evaluations of ambulatory and inpatient components of third-year clerkships in internal medicine, obstetrics/gynaecology, paediatrics, psychiatry, and surgery. Seventy-two students completed evaluation questionnaires at the conclusion of each of five clerkships over 12 months. Although ambulatory and inpatient evaluations were comparable across all five specialties in several areas, ambulatory education was rated more favorably in scheduling, clear definition of student roles and responsibilities, appropriate supervision, timely and constructive feedback, being welcomed, and working in a non-threatening environment.Student feedback thus implied that ambulatory experiences were comparable to, or better than, inpatient experiences and suggests areas for improving clinical education in inpatient settings.