330
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Spectral characterization of necrosis from reflectance of Eucalyptus globulus leaves with Mycosphaerella leaf disease or subjected to artificial lesions

, , , &
Pages 9243-9259 | Received 08 Jun 2010, Accepted 05 Dec 2010, Published online: 29 Sep 2011
 

Abstract

Necrosis is one of a range of symptoms resulting from a number of different biotic and abiotic damage agents that may be detected and quantified with remote sensing as part of an operational forest health monitoring system. Mycosphaerella leaf disease (MLD) caused by Teratosphaeria spp. (formerly known as Mycosphaerella spp.) is the most common foliar disease in young Australian Eucalyptus globulus plantations. Necrosis often occurs in conjunction with other visible symptoms such as chlorosis and reddening, and we have tested whether these symptoms alter the ability of spectral approaches to detect necrosis. We completed two studies of necrosis with pot-grown E. globulus plants; one in which necrosis was induced by artificial infection of Teratosphaeria spp. and one in which necrosis was induced by injury, superimposed on plants with established reddening or chlorosis. Using spectral sensitivity analysis we found that across the two studies, wavelengths between 679 and 695 nm were most sensitive to the presence of necrosis and those between 706 and 726 nm were least sensitive. A new vegetation index (VI) was able to statistically group necrotic treatments together while grouping non-necrotic treatments together, regardless of reddening and chlorosis, which other relevant indices could not. Multivariate methods utilized many wavelengths throughout the spectrum and enabled much greater distinction of all treatment groups related to necrosis, compared with the VIs. Wavelengths in the 679–695 nm range were only occasionally selected as key wavelengths; therefore, results were not similar to the spectral sensitivity data.

Acknowledgement

These studies were part of project LP0453591 funded by the Australian Research Council and five industry partners (Forestry Tasmania, Forests and Forest Industries Council of Tasmania, Forests NSW, Gunns Ltd. and WAPRES).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.