983
Views
85
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multi-scale validation of GLEAM evapotranspiration products over China via ChinaFLUX ET measurements

, , , &
Pages 5688-5709 | Received 23 Mar 2016, Accepted 13 Jun 2017, Published online: 05 Jul 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Land evapotranspiration (ET) is a key component of terrestrial ecosystems, as it is the nexus of hydrological, energy, and carbon cycles. Satellite-based observations are commonly utilized to provide high-resolution, large-scale ET estimates. The ground-based validation of such large-scale estimates is necessary to ensure that remotely sensed ET characteristics are accurate, and to extend their various applications. The Global Land-surface Evaporation Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM) combines a wide range of multi-satellite observations to estimate daily actual evaporation through a process-based methodology. In this study, we focused on evaluating a daily GLEAM 0.25° ET product using in-situ eddy covariance (EC) ET data (2003–2005) as a benchmark at eight sites from the Chinese Flux Observation and Research Network (ChinaFLUX), which contains several biome types (croplands, grasslands, shrublands, savannas, and forests) across China at a range of temporal scales (from daily, to monthly, to annual). The results indicated that the ET products of the Global Land-surface Evaporation Amsterdam Methodology (GLEAM ET) over different time scales can estimate actual ET with reasonable accuracy. GLEAM showed high skill scores for most of the land-cover types except at the Xishuangbanna forest site (XSBN), where significantly systematic bias was detected at each individual temporal scale. Overall, GLEAM ET products were closer to the EC observations at the three grassland sites than at the four forest sites or the cropland site. GLEAM significantly overestimated the EC measurements at the four forest sites and one cropland site, while a slight underestimation occurred at the three grassland sites; there was a year-long systematic overestimation for GLEAM at the four forest sites. The daily GLEAM ET aggregated by monthly and annual data agreed more closely with EC measurements than those taken at the daily timescale. The results also showed a high average correlation coefficient (r) with in-situ EC observations at all sites, at daily (r = 0.71), monthly (r = 0.86), and annual (r = 0.79) time scales in addition to ET season-dependent characteristics for satellite estimation errors. The results presented here contribute to further assessment of the quality and uncertainty of GLEAM ET products, which may benefit future advancements in the ET algorithm and its product quality.

Acknowledgements

Dr. Miralles provide some useful feedback and computation assistance in this work. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers, who helped to improve the earlier version of this article.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China: [Grant Numbers 41401017, 51379056, 91437214, and 91547101], National Key Research and Development Program of China: [Grant Number 2016YFA0601504].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.