262
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Species stratification and upscaling of forest carbon estimates to landscape scale using GeoEye-1 image and lidar data in sub-tropical forests of Nepal

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 7941-7965 | Received 10 Apr 2018, Accepted 09 Feb 2019, Published online: 30 Apr 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Aboveground forest biomass and carbon estimation at landscape scale is crucial for implementation of REDD+ programmes. This study aims to upscale the forest carbon estimates using GeoEye-1 image and small footprint lidar data from small areas to a landscape level using RapidEye image. Species stratification was carried out based on the spectral separability curve of GeoEye-1 image, and comparison of mean intensity and mean plot height of the trees from lidar data. GeoEye-1 image and lidar data were segmented using region growing approach to delineate individual tree crowns; and the segmented crowns (CPA) of tree were further used to establish a relationship with field measured carbon and total trees’ height. Carbon stock measured from field, individual tree crown (ITC) segmentation approach and area-based approach (ABA) was compared at plot level using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey comparison test. ITC-based carbon estimates was used to establish a relationship with spectral reflectance of RapidEye image variables (NDVI, RedEdge NDVI, PC1, single band of RedEdge, and NIR) to upscale the carbon at landscape level. One-way ANOVA resulted in a highly significant difference (p-value < 0.005) between the mean plot height and lidar intensity to stratify Shorea robusta and Other species successfully. ITC carbon stock estimation models of two major tree species explained about 88% and 79% of the variances, respectively, at 95% confidence level. The ABA estimated carbon was highly correlated (R2 = 0.83, RMSE = 20.04) to field measured carbon with higher accuracy than the ITC estimated carbon. A weak relationship was observed between the carbon stock and the RapidEye image variables. However, upscaling of carbon estimates from ABA is likely to improve the relationship of the RapidEye variables rather than upscaling the carbon estimates from ITC approach.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Himlal Shrestha and Eak Bahadur Rana from ICIMOD and B.K. Rana and Purna Magar from ANSAB for helping us during our field data collection. Thanks are also due to FRA project and Arbonaut Limited (especially Mr Basanta Gautam for addressing the reviewer’s comments) for providing us with the satellite images and lidar data for this research. This research is a result of collaboration between ITC, University of Twente, Netherlands and the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD) under the REDD+ project. We also acknowledge the support of Dr Mihai A. Tanase and Dr Lauren Bennett, The University of Melbourne, for their intuitive insights to address the reviewer’s comments. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.