567
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Customizing unmanned aircraft systems to reduce forest inventory costs: can oblique images substantially improve the 3D reconstruction of the canopy?

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 3480-3510 | Received 21 May 2019, Accepted 29 Sep 2019, Published online: 07 Jan 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Photogrammetry makes it possible to estimate forest canopy surface at lower costs than light detection and ranging (LiDAR), which is considered the best data source to evaluate forest structure. Recent studies even suggest that points of forest understories can be obtained by means of unmanned aerial photogrammetry. However, little is known about how the characteristics of image sets, processing workflows, and forest openness affect understory point surveying. For forest inventories, unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) of fixed-wing type are preferred because they can survey large areas. It has been shown that the accuracy of UAS photogrammetry tends to increase by adding oblique images but acquiring them with fixed-wing UASs is challenging. To address this challenge, we proposed a multi-camera array for acquiring oblique images with fixed-wing UASs. To test our idea, we built two customized UAS and surveyed an open pine plantation and a tall deciduous forest with variable overstory density. The open plantation was selected for optimizing the measurement of reference canopy surface points using a terrestrial laser scanner. In the deciduous forest, we obtained reference understory points from a leaf-off photogrammetry survey. We confirm that including oblique images in the image set is a good practice for forestry applications. Using the UASs to test whether a multi-camera system is better than a single-camera system for acquiring nadir-oblique image sets, we conclude that the advantages are (1) more efficient acquisition of oblique images and (2) better understory modelling in open canopies. The multi-camera acquisition of oblique images increases the understory point density, making the estimation of crown cover percentage and maximum canopy height more accurate, by 33% and 50%, respectively.

Acknowledgements

We thank Verónica Verano and Héctor Gonda for language help, and Ariel Neri for field help.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data associated with this article can be found on the following OSF repository: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/SJXND.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica under Grant Scientific and Technological Research Project 3325; and Centro de Investigación y Extensión Forestal Andino Patagónico under Grant research programme [P7/A1/002-26.966].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.