The civilised self and the barbaric other: imperial delusions of order and the challenges of human security

Abstract

In the aftermath of the military conflicts of 1936 – 45, there seemed to be a global renunciation of war as an instrument of state policy. Shortly thereafter, however, decades of ideological attrition between the major powers and the inherent perversion of postcolonial states reduced the solemn declarations of 1945 to ineffectual rhetoric. Underpinning the decline and demise of a human-centred approach to global peace and security is the enduring notion of the civilised self and the barbaric other. The polarisation of humanity between camps of the savage and the civilised has continued to animate international policy making despite denials. This paper argues that a rejection of the polarities is imperative for the success of the emergent concept of human security.

Notes

1 Ikechi Mgbeoji, Collective Insecurity: The Liberian Crisis, Unilateralism & Global Order, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2003.

2 Upendra Baxi, ‘Geographies of injustice: human rights at the altar of convenience’, in C Scott (ed), Torture as Tort: Comparative Perspectives on the Development of Transnational Human Rights Litigation, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001.

3 B Rajagopal, ‘Locating the Third World in cultural geography’, Third World Legal Studies, 1, 1988 – 89, pp 1 – 12; K Mickelson, ‘Rhetoric and rage: Third World voices in international legal discourse’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 16, 1994, pp 353 – 360.

4 Ikechi Mgbeoji, ‘The bearded bandit, the outlaw cop, and the naked emperor: towards a North – South deconstruction of the text and contexts of international law's disengagement with terrorism’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 43(2), 2005, pp 105 – 135.

5 Tony Judt, ‘Israel: the alternative’, New York Review of Books, 50 (16), 2003, pp 1 – 7.

6 A Rashid, Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000; Rashid, Jihad: The Rise of Militant Islam in Central Asia, New York: Penguin Books, 2003; and RB Wright, Sacred Rage: The Wrath of Militant Islam, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001.

7 James Kraska, ‘Averting nuclear terrorism: building a global regime of cooperative threat reduction’, American University International Law Review, 20, 2005, pp 703 – 712; and Miriam Sapiro, ‘Iraq: the shifting sands of preemptive self-defense’, American Journal of International Law, 97, 2003, pp 599 – 615.

8 Obi Aginam, ‘Global village, divided world: South North gap and global health challenge at century's dawn’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7, 2000, pp 603 – 620; and Lauren Asher, ‘Confronting disease in a global arena’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9, 2001, p 35.

9 See Mohamed Bedjaoui, ‘Poverty of the international order’, in R Falk, F Kratochwil & S Mendlovitz (eds), International Law: A Contemporary Perspective, Boulder, CO: Westview, 1985, p 153; David Slater, ‘Contesting occidental visions of the global: the geopolitics of theory and North – South relations’, Beyond Law, December 1994, pp 97 – 106; and Convention Concerning the Protection and Integration of Indigenous and other Tribal and Semi-Tribal Populations in Independent Countries, 26 June 1957, reprinted in 328 United Nations Treaty Series (UNTS), 328, p 247.

10 David L Peterson, ‘Debunking ten myths about democracy in Africa’, Washington Quarterly, 17, 1994, pp 129 – 140.

11 Nancy Chang, Silencing Political Dissent—How Post-September 11 Anti-Terrorism Measures threaten our Civil Liberties, New York: Seven Stories Press, 2002.

12 M Mutua, ‘What is twail?’, American Society of International Law (ASIL) Proceedings, 94, 2000, pp 31 – 35; A Anghie, et al (eds), The Third World and International Order: Law, Politics, and Globalization, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003; J Gathii, ‘International law and Eurocentricity’, European Journal of International Law, 9, 1998, p 184; and OC Okafor, ‘Newness, imperialism, and international legal reform in our time: a twail perspective’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 171 (43), 2001, pp 174 – 180.

13 Zia Sarhadi, ‘Taliban's “Islamic Emirate”: what will they think of next?’, available online at http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world98, accessed 20 October 2005. See also ‘Taliban measure beards with lantern glass’, nni, 3 December 1998, at www.rawa.org/beard.html, accessed 20 October 2005.

14 C Chandrasekha, ‘Flying while brown: federal civil rights remedies to post-9/11 airline racial profiling of South Asians’, Asian Law Journal, 10, 2003, pp 215 – 230; and M Ahmad, ‘A rage shared by law: post-September 11 racial violence as crimes of passion’, California Law Review, 92, 2004, p 1259.

15 See oecd in Figures: Statistics on the Member Countries, Supplement to the oecd Observer, 152, 1988, pp 4 – 5; and A Sawyer, ‘Marginalization of Africa and human development’, African Journal of International and Comparative Law (AJICL), 5, 1993, p 176.

16 N Adams, Worlds Apart: The North – South Divide and the International System, London: Zed Books, 1993.

17 I Seidl-Hohenveldern, International Economic Law, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1989, p 4; and W Langley, ‘The Third World: towards a definition’, Boston College Third World Law Journal, 2 (1), 1981, pp 1 – 12.

18 Cerebrating on Columbus and his legacy—protest obscures the large point: repeating pattern of European conquest', Editors Report, 17 October 2005, at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9664359/, accessed 8 November 2005.

19 Ikechi Mgbeoji, Global Biopiracy: Patents, Plants, and Indigenous Peoples, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2005, pp 85 – 87.

20 Makau Wa Mutua, ‘Savages, victims and saviours: the metaphor of human rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 42 (1), 2001, pp 201 – 245.

21 Guillermo Floris Margadant, ‘Official Mexican attitudes towards the Indians: an historical essay’, Tulane Law Review, 54 (2), 1980, pp 967 – 995.

22 Makua wa Mutua, ‘What is twail?’.

23 Zachary Lockman, Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp 27 – 30. The term ‘Middle East’ is equally Eurocentric.

24 Falk, ‘Imperial vibrations, 9/11, and the ordeal of the Middle East’, Paper 23, Global and International Studies Program, University of California at Los Angeles, 2005, p 8.

25 Lockman, Contending Visions of the Middle East, p 176.

26 Ibid, p 175.

27 Douglas Sanders, ‘The re-emergence of indigenous questions in international law’, Canadian Human Rights Yearbook, Vancouver: UBC Press, 1983, pp 1 – 15.

28 Mark Javis (ed), The Influence of Religion on the Development of International Law, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1991.

29 Mark Lindley, The Acquisition and Government of Backward Territory in International Law: Being a Treatise on the Law and Practice relating to Colonial Expansion, New York: Longman, 1969.

30 Tony Judt, ‘Israel: the alternative’.

31 James Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979.

32 EK Quashigah, ‘Protection of human rights in the changing international scene: prospects in sub-Saharan Africa’, AJICL, 6 (1), 1994, pp 93 – 95.

33 General Act of the Conference of Berlin, reprinted in RJ Garvin & JA Betley (eds), The Scramble for Africa: Documents on the Berlin West African Conference and Related Subjects 1884 – 1885, London: Longman, 1973.

34 See Harold Pinter, Nobel Prize Speech, available online at http://nobelprize.org/literature/laureates/2005/pinter-lecture-e.html

35 RA Akindele, The Organization and Promotion of World Peace—A Study of Universal – Regional Relationships, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1976, pp 3 – 6.

36 Hans Kelsen, Collective Security at International Law, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1957, p 3.

37 Henry Kissinger, A World Restored, New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1964, pp 11 – 12.

38 MV Naidu, Collective Security and the United Nations—A Definition of the UN Security System, New York: St Martins Press, 1974, pp 4 – 5.

39 Grant Dexter, Canada and the Building of Peace, Toronto: Canadian Institute of International Affairs, 1944, p 141.

40 The events usually described as ‘world wars’ are better understood as intra-regional struggles for the control of Europe. Richard Falk, ‘Imperial vibrations’.

41 Obiora Okafor, ‘Is there a legitimacy deficit in international legal scholarship and practice?’, International Insights, 17 (1), 1997, pp 91 – 120.

42 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 999 UNTS, 1996, p 171.

43 Inis Claude, Swords into Ploughshares, New York: Random House, 1964, pp 32 – 38.

44 Robert Keohane & Joseph Nye, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1977; and Robert Keohane, After Hegemony, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.

45 Stephen Walt, ‘The renaissance of security studies’, International Studies Quarterly, 35 (1), 1991, pp 35 – 40.

46 Richard Falk, ‘A new paradigm for international legal studies: prospects and proposals’, in Falk et al, International Law, pp 651 – 702.

47 Frederick Kratochwil, ‘Sovereignty as dominium’, in Gene Lyons & Michael Mastanduno (eds), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995, pp 23 – 30.

48 Khatchik Derghoukassian, Human Secrity: A Brief Report on the State of the Art, Dante B Fascell North – South Center Working Paper No 3, November 2001, p 1.

49 Janne Nolan (ed), Global Engagement: Cooperation and Security in the 21st Century, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 1994.

50 Karsten Nowrot & Emily Schabada, ‘The use of force to restore democracy: international implications of the ecowas intervention in Sierra Leone’, American Journal of International Law, 92 (1), 1998, pp 1 – 55.

51 Jost Dulbreck, ‘Globalization of law, politics, and markets: implication for local law—a European perspective’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 1 (1), 1993, pp 9 – 36.

52 Rob Macrae & Don Hubert, Human Security and the New Diplomacy: Protecting People, Promoting Peace, Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2001.

53 Sabina Alkire, ‘A conceptual framework for human security’, crise Working Paper 2, on file with the author.

54 See http://www.undp.org/hdro/e94over.htm.

55 E Rothschild, ‘What is security?’, Daedalus, 124, 1994, pp 53 – 98.

56 H Hafterdorn, ‘The security puzzle: theory building and discipline building in international security’, International Security Quarterly, 31, 1991, pp 3 – 17.

57 Freedom from Fear, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada, 2004.

58 Kanti Bajpai, Human Security: Concept and Measurement, Kroc Institute Occasional Paper 19, August 2000.

59 Edward Newman, ‘Human security and constructivism’, International Studies Perspectives, 2001, 2 (3).

60 Roland Paris, ‘Human security: paradigm shift or hot air?’, International Security, 26 (2), 2001, pp 87 – 102.

61 Lloyd Axworthy, ‘Canada and human security: the need for leadership’, International Journal, Spring 1997, pp 183 – 196.

62 Freedom from Fear.

63 Peter Stoet, Human and Global Security: An Exploration of Terms, Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999.

64 Fen Hampson, Jean Daudelin et al, Madness in the Multitude: Human Security and World Disorder, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

65 Jack Donnely, ‘Human dignity, human rights and political regime’, American Political Science Review, 80 (4), 1986, pp 801 – 820.

66 Margaret Doxey, United Nations Sanctions: Current Policy Issues, Halifax: Centre for Foreign Policy Studies, Dalhousie University, 1999.

67 Obiora Chinedu Okafor, ‘The African system of human and people's rights, quasi-constructivism, and the possibility of peacebuilding within African states’, International Journal of Human Rights, 8 (4), 2004, pp 413 – 450.

68 John Norton Moore, ‘Beyond the democratic peace: solving the war puzzle’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 44, 2004, p 341.

69 Rudolph J Rummel, Death by Government, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press, 1994.

70 Makau wa Mutua, ‘Savages, victims, and saviors: the metaphor of human rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 42 (1), 2001, pp 201 – 250.

71 Nsongurua J Udombana, ‘Can a leopard change its spots? The African Union Treaty and human rights’, American University International Law Review, 17 (3), 2002, pp 1177 – 1200.

72 New Partnership for Africa's Development (nepad), 2001, para 4, at http://www.uneca.org/nepad/nepad.pdf.

73 See Decision on Refugees, para 1, Organisation of African Unity (oau) Council of Ministers, oau Doc CM/Dec 574 (LXXIII), 2000.

74 Mutua, ‘Savages, victims, and saviors’, p 204.

75 Ibid.

76 William Pfaff, ‘A new colonialism? Europe must go back to Africa’, Foreign Affairs, 74, 1995, p 1; and Ali Mazrui, ‘The message of Rwanda: recolonize Africa?’, New Perspective Quarterly, 2 (4), 1994, p 18.

77 A Selassie, ‘Ethnic identity and constitutional design for Africa’, Stanford Journal of International Law, 29, 1992, pp 12 – 25.

78 Okechukwu Oko, ‘Partition or perish: restoring social equilibrium in Nigeria through reconfiguration’, Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 8 (2), 1998, pp 317 – 330.

79 Richard Mukisa, ‘Toward a peaceful resolution of Africa's colonial boundaries’, Africa Today, 44 (1), 1997, p 7.

80 Henry Richardson, ‘Failed states, self determination, and preventive diplomacy: colonialist nostalgia and democratic expectations’, Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, 10 (1), 1996, pp 45 – 60.

81 Makau wa Mutua, ‘Putting Humpty Dumpty back together again: the dilemma of a post-colonial African state’, Brookings Journal of International Law, 21 (2), 1995, pp 5 – 15.

82 Mukisa, ‘Toward a peaceful resolution of Africa's colonial boundaries’, p 21.

83 Ali Mazrui, ‘The African as a political refugee: institutional collapse and human displacement’, International Journal of Refugee Studies, July 1995, pp 22 – 30.

84 Rashidi Khalidi, Resurrecting Empire: Western Footprints and America's Path in the Middle East, Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 2004, p 175.

85 Upendra Baxi, ‘Market fundamentalisms: business ethics at the altar of human rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 5 (1), 2005, pp 1 – 26.

86 Joanne Gowa, Ballots and Bullets: The Elusive Democratic Peace, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.

87 Stuart Bremer, ‘Dangerous dyads: conditions affecting the likelihood of interstate war, 1816 – 1965’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36 (2), pp 309 – 341; and Paul Diehl & Gary Goertz, War and Peace in International Rivalry, Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2000.

88 Paul Barker, ‘Queries from Afghanistan’, Friends Journal, September 2003, pp 1 – 10.

89 Ibid.

90 George W Bush, ‘Commencement Address at the United States Military Academy in West Point, June 1, 2002’, 38 Weekly Comp Pres Doc 944, 946, 10 June 2002.

91 The National Security Strategy of the United States of America', 15 September 2002, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov.nsc/nss.pdf.

92 Henry Kissinger, ‘Consult and control: bywords for battling the new enemy’, Washington Post, 16 September 2002, p A19. See also Justice Robert Jackson in Koretmasu v United States, 323 US 214 AT 246 (1944).

93 Joan Hoff, ‘The American Century: from Sarajevo to Sarajevo’, Diplomatic History, 23 (2), 1999, p 285.

94 James Rubin, ‘Stumbling into war’, Foreign Affairs, 82 (4), 2003, p 46.

95 Madeline Albright, ‘Bridges, bombs, or bluster?’, Foreign Affairs, 82 (5), 2003, pp 1 – 2.

96 Ikechi Mgbeoji, ‘Prophylactic use of force in international law: the illegitimacy of Canada's participation in “coalitions of the willing” without United Nations authorization and parliamentary sanction’, Review of Constitutional Studies, 8 (2), 2003, pp 169 – 202.

97 Marjorie Cohn, ‘Understanding, responding to, and preventing terrorism’, Arab Studies Quarterly, 24 (2), 2002, p 25.

98 D Kreiger & D Chafee, ‘Facing the failures of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty regime’, Humanist, 63 (5), 2003, p 7.

99 AL Goodhart, ‘Some legal aspects of the Suez situation’, in Philip Thayer (ed), Tensions in the Middle East, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1958, pp 259 – 260.

100 Richard Gardner, ‘Future implications of the Iraq conflict: neither Bush nor the “jurisprudes”’, American Journal of International Law, 585, 97 (1), 2003, pp 2 – 10.

101 Human Security Report 2005, available online at www.humansecurityreport.info/index.

102 Hilary Charlesworth, ‘International law: a discipline of crisis’, Modern Law Review, 65 (1), 2002, pp 377 – 390.