Gendering Liberalisation and Labour Reform in Malaysia: fostering ‘competitiveness’ in the productive and reproductive economies

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine how and why gender needs to be brought into the analysis of state developmentalism in Asia. In doing so, the paper focuses on ongoing processes of labour market and industrial relations reform that have accompanied Malaysia's economic development since the early 1970s. Understanding these reforms from a gender perspective means that we must recognise both the significant contribution that women make to the growth of export manufacturing industries and the role that social relations of reproduction play in underpinning economic reform and transformation. The analysis explores how gendered social relations (of production and reproduction) have been central to the labour politics of Malaysia's state-led developmentalism and how ideas of maintaining ‘competitiveness’ through the attempts to transition to a more knowledge-centred economy have entailed particular roles and responsibilities for women. Attempts to maintain economic competitiveness in Malaysia have rested upon ideas concerning the need to integrate women more fully into the formal labour market and a greater recognition of the contribution of social relations of reproduction to capitalist accumulation. The article discusses some of the tensions and contradictions that have emanated from this policy shift.

Notes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Convention of Asian Scholars (ICAS5) in Kuala Lumpur, August 2007. I would like to thank Lucy Ferguson and Marcus Taylor for their useful comments on earlier drafts.

1 World Bank, East Asia: The Road to Recovery, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

2 K Jayasuriya, ‘Beyond institutional fetishism: from the developmental to the regulatory state’, New Political Economy, 10 (3), 2005, pp 381–387.

3 P Burkett & M Hart-Landsberg, ‘A critique of “catch-up” theories of development’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 33 (2), 2003, p 166.

4 I Bakker & S Gill, ‘Ontology, method, hypothesis’, in Bakker & Gill (eds), Power, Production and Social Reproduction, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, p 34.

5 I Bakker, ‘Neo-liberal governance and the reprivatisation of social reproduction: social provisioning and shifting gender orders’, in Bakker & Gill, Power, Production and Social Reproduction, pp 66–82.

6 S Rai, ‘Gendering global governance’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6 (4), 2004, p 583.

7 Asian Development Bank, Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The Poverty Reduction Strategy, Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2004.

8 M Mahatir, ‘Malaysia: the Third Outline Perspective Plan Speech by the Prime Minister in the Dewan Rakyat’, 3 April 2001, at http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN003664.pdf, accessed 18 October 2007.

9 T Fougner, ‘The state, international competitiveness and neoliberal globalisation: is there a future beyond the competition state?’, Review of International Studies, 32 (1), 2006, pp 165–185.

10 For example, the essays in K Hewison & R Robison (eds), East Asia and the Trials of Neoliberalism, New York: Routledge, 2006.

11 S Rai, Gender and the Political Economy of Development, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002, p 105.

12 S Razavi, ‘Export-oriented employment, poverty and gender: contested accounts’, Development & Change, 30(3), 1999, pp 653–683.

13 RW Connell, Gender and Power, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1987.

14 Bakker & Gill, ‘Ontology, method, hypothesis’, p 34.

15 CBN Chin, ‘The state of the “state” in globalisation: social order and economic restructuring in Malaysia’, Third World Quarterly, 21 (6), p 1039.

16 BT Khoo, ‘The state and market in Malaysian political economy’, in G Rodan, K Hewison & R Robinson (eds), The Political Economy of Southeast Asia: Conflict, Crisis and Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp 178–205.

17 As a result of its colonial past, Malaysia is an ethnically diverse country and the state officially recognises three major ethnic groups: Malay (or Bumiputera), Chinese and Indian.

18 Second Malaysia Plan 1971–1975, Kuala Lumpur: Government Printers, 1971, p 1.

19 W Case, ‘Malaysia: new reforms, old continuities, tense ambiguities’, Journal of Development Studies, 41 (2), 2005, pp 284–309.

20 Chin, ‘The state of the “state” in globalisation’, p 1043.

21 T Caraway, ‘The political economy of feminisation: from “cheap labour” to gendered discourses of work’, Politics and Gender, 1 (3), 2006, pp 399–429.

22 C Ng & M Maznah, ‘Primary but not subordinated: changing class and gender relations in rural Malaysia’, in B Agarwal (ed), Structures of Patriarchy: The State, Community and the Household, London: Zed, 1990, pp 52–82.

23 R Leete, Malaysia's Demographic Transition: Rapid Development, Culture and Politics, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1996.

24 CBN Chin, In Service and Servitude: Foreign Female Domestic Workers and the Malaysian Modernity Project, New York: Columbia University Press, 1998, p 167.

25 J Elias, ‘Stitching-up the labour market: recruitment, gender and ethnicity in the multinational firm’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7 (1), 2005, pp 90–111.

26 A Ong, Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia, Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1987.

27 J Ariffin, From Kampung to Urban Factories: Findings from the HAWA Study, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1994.

28 I Shari, ‘Globalisation and economic insecurity: a need for a new economic policy in Malaysia’, Asian Journal of Social Science, 31 (2), 2003, p 259.

29 R Stubbs, Rethinking Asia's Economic Miracle, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, p 187.

30 KS Jomo & P Wad, ‘In-house unions: “Looking East” for industrial relations’, in KS Jomo (ed), Japan and Malaysian Development: In the Shadow of the Rising Sun, London: Routledge, 1994.

31 PF Kelly, ‘Spaces of labour control: comparative perspectives from Southeast Asia’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 27 (4), 2002, pp 395–411; and J Elias, ‘The gendered political economy of control and resistance from the shop floor of the multinational firm: a case study from Malaysia’, New Political Economy, 10 (2), 2005, pp 203–222.

32 I Shari, ‘Globalisation and economic insecurity’.

33 Elias, ‘Stitching-up the labour market’.

34 I Rahman & HMZ Ragayah, ‘Earning differentials between skills in the Malaysian manufacturing sector’, Asian Economic Journal, 17 (4), 2003, pp 325–340.

35 OPP2, also known as the National Development Policy (NDP), was presented as replacing the NEP.

36 M Mahatir, ‘Malaysia: the way forward’, speech to the Malaysian Business Council, 1993, at http://www.wawasan2020.com/vision/index.html, accessed 10 October 2007.

37 This site for high-tech industries on a block of land near Kuala Lumpur International Airport was seen as having a symbolic importance—promoting Malaysia's image as a high-tech, competitive economy.

38 Third Outline Perspective Plan 2001–2010, Kuala Lumpur: Government Printers, 2001, p 119.

39 Mahatir ‘Malaysia: the Third Outline Perspective Plan Speech’, p 27. See also Eighth Malaysia Plan 2001–2005, Kuala Lumpur: Government Printers, 2001, p 119.

40 D Turner, ‘The Malaysian state and the régulation of labour: from colonial economy to K-economy’, PhD thesis, Murdoch University, 2006, p 254.

41 Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006–2010, Kuala Lumpur: Government Printers, 2005, p 259.

42 J Henderson & R Phillips, ‘Unintended consequences: social policy, state institutions and the “stalling” of the Malaysian industrialisation project’, Economy and Society, 36 (1), 2007, pp 77–101.

43 World Bank & Economic Planning Unit (EPU), Malaysia and the Knowledge Economy: Building a World Class Higher Education System, Report No 40397-MY, 2007, at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMALAYSIA/Resources/Malaysia-Knowledge-Economy2007.pdf, accessed 7 January 2008, emphasis added.

44 S Bergeron, ‘The post-Washington Consensus and economic representations of women in development at the World Bank’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5 (3), 2003, pp 397–419.

45 P Cammack, ‘What the World Bank means by poverty reduction and why it matters’, New Political Economy, 9 (2), 2004, p 206.

46 Bakker & Gills, ‘Ontology, methodology, hypothesis’, p 34.

47 M Mahatir, ‘Transcending the divide’, speech by the PM the Hon Dato Seri Dr Mahatir Mohammad at the Second World Knowledge Conference, Kuala Lumpur, 8 March 2000, at http://www.globalknowledge.org/gkii/gkiispeech_malaysianprimeminister.doc, accessed 10 January 2008.

48 Ninth Malaysia Plan, p 281.

49 Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia: Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: Successes and Challenges, Kuala Lumpur: UNDP, 2005, p 91.

50 World Bank & EPU, Malaysia and the Knowledge Economy, p 23.

51 A Kamogawa, ‘Higher education reform: challenges of a knowledge society in Malaysia’, Asian and African Studies, 2 (4), pp 545–563.

52 World Bank & EPU, Malaysia and the Knowledge Economy, p 32.

53 EPU & United Nation's Country Team Malaysia, Malaysia—Achieving the Millennium Development Goals: Successes and Challenges, Kuala Lumpur, UNDP, p 99; and ‘News: Ninth Malaysia Plan’, The Star, 31 March 2006.

54 EPU & United Nation's Country Team Malaysia, Malaysia, p 99.

55 See http://www.ehomemakers.net/en/aboutus.php?id=63, accessed 17 October 2007.

56 M Stivens, ‘Sex, gender and the making of the new Malay middle class’, in K Sen & Stivens (eds), Gender and Power in Affluent Asia, London: Routledge, 1998, pp 87–126.

57 C Ng & S Mitter, ‘Valuing women's voices: call centre workers in Malaysia and India’, Gender, Technology and Development, 9 (2), 2005, pp 209–233.

58 Cited in Swasti Mitter, ‘Globalisation, ICTs and economic empowerment: a feminist critique’, Gender, Technology and Development, 8 (1), 2004, p 20.

59 C Ng, M Maznah & tb hui, Feminism and the Women's Movement in Malaysia: An Unsung (R)evolution, London: Routledge, 2005, p 109.

60 Turner, ‘The Malaysian state and the régulation of Labour’, pp 239, 332.

61 Eighth Malaysia Plan, cited in Ng at al, Feminism and the Women's Movement in Malaysia, p 108.

62 Ng at al, Feminism and the Women's Movement in Malaysia, p 115.

63 Ninth Malaysia Plan, p 314.

64 Ibid, p 259.

65 M Stivens, ‘“Family values” and Islamic revival: gender, rights and state moral projects in Malaysia’, Women's Studies International Forum, 29 (4), 2006, pp 354–367.

66 Ninth Malaysia Plan, p 259.

67 K Bedford, ‘The imperative of male inclusion: how institutional context influences World Bank gender policy’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9 (3), 2007, pp 289–311.

68 Turner, ‘The Malaysian state and the régulation of labour’, p 332.

69 ‘Malaysian union calls for limits on number of foreign workers at country's main airport’, International Herald Tribune, 10 October 2007.

70 Chin, In Service and Servitude; and Stivens, ‘Sex, gender and the making of the new Malay middle class’.