Vulnerability and resilience: critical reflexivity in gendered violence research

Abstract

South Asian women are a focus area for organisations such as the UN, World Bank and WHO, where violence against women severely constrains policy instruments such as the Millennium Development Goals. The field researcher is often invisible in research space, which informs policy in practice. Through critical reflexivity we rupture the silence on researcher vulnerability, foregrounding researcher resilience as the ethical compass in the research space of gendered violence. Through narratives of researchers as development actors in the river of corrosiveness involved in acid violence research, we offer a typology for researcher resilience for consideration in research designs for policy development.

Keywords:

• Acid violence
• critical reflexivity
• researcher resilience
• ethics
• researcher harm
• South Asian women

Notes

1. Barakat and Wardell, “Exploited by Whom?”; and MacFarlane et al., “The Responsibility to Protect,” 986.

2. Cornwall and Brock. “What do Buzzwords Do?,” 1044.

3. Escobar. “Beyond the Third World.”

4. Rhodes. “After Reflexivity,” 662.

5. Wesson. “A Situational Assessment.”

6. Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

7. Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women.”

8. Asaria et al., “Acid Burns.”

9. Mannan et al., “Cases of Chemical Assault.”

10. Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

11. Ahmad, “Acid Attacks.”

12. Halim Chowdhury, “Negotiating State and NGO Politics.”

13. Ellsberg and Heise, “Bearing Witness.”

14. Sikweyiya, and Jewkes, “Perceptions about Safety.”

15. Reivich et al., “Master Resilience Training,” 25.

16. Riessman, “Exporting Ethics.”

17. Bahn, “Keeping Academic Field Researchers Safe.”

18. Bahn and Weatherill, “Qualitative Social Research.”

19. Abrahams, “Ethics in Counselling.”

20. Riessman, “Exporting Ethics.”

21. Liamputtong, Researching the Vulnerable.

22. Turner and Norwood, “Body of Research”; Lorenzo et al., “Safety and Ethics”; and Koning and Ooi, “Awkward Encounters.”

23. Murray and Holmes, “Toward a Critical Ethical Reflexivity,” 345.

24. Cunliffe, “Reflexive Inquiry.”

25. Rhodes, “After Reflexivity.”

26. Weick, “Conclusion,” 803.

27. Freshwater and Rolfe, “Critical Reflexivity,” 532.

28. Freshwater and Rolfe, “Critical Reflexivity,” 534.

29. Andersson et al., “Collecting Reliable Information.”

30. Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women”; Asaria et al., “Acid Burns”; and Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

31. Fontes, “Ethics in Violence,” 168.

32. Clark and Walker, “Research Ethics.”

33. Sikweyiya and Jewkes, “Perceptions about Safety”; and Ponic and Jategaonkar, “Balancing Safety.”

34. Davison, “Dilemmas in Research.”

35. Faqir, “Intrafamily Femicide.”

36. Clark and Walker, “Research Ethics”; and Lange al., “Vulnerability in Research.”

37. Clark and Walker, “Research Ethics”; Gilfus et al., “Research on Violence,” 1194; Silva-Martínez and Murty, “Ethics and Cultural Competence”; Parkes, “Research on/as Violence”; González-López, “Mindful Ethics”; Ponic and Jategaonkar, “Balancing Safety”; Ellsberg and Heise, “Bearing Witness”; Abrahams, “Ethics in Counselling”; Becker-Blease and Freyd, “Research Participants”; Riessman, “Exporting Ethics”; Mirza, “Acid Attack Survivor”; “Sharmeen Obaid”; and “Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy’s ‘Saving Face’ Scandal.”

38. Dickson-Swift et al., “Doing Sensitive Research”; Nilan, “‘Dangerous Fieldwork’ Re-examined”; Davison, “Dilemmas in Research”; Malacrida, “Reflexive Journaling”; and Barr and Welch, “Keeping Nurse Researchers Safe.”

39. Rhodes, “After Reflexivity,” 666–667.

40. Pio and Syed, “Our Bodies, Our Minds”; Solotaroff and Pande, Violence against Women; “Analysis – South Asia’s Growing Modernity”; and Priya et al., Study on Masculinity.

41. Solotaroff and Pande, Violence against Women.

42. Griffiths et al., “The Socio-political.”

43. Castella. “How many Acid Attacks?”

44. Kalantry and Kestenbaum, Combating Acid Violence; and Priya et al., Study on Masculinity.

45. Priya et al., Study on Masculinity.

46. John et al., “India.”

47. Faga et al. “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women”; Milton et al., “Chemical Assault; and Asaria et al., “Acid Burns.”

48. Faga et al. “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women”; and Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

49. Milton et al., “Chemical Assault”; and Wesson, “A Situational Assessment.”

50. Halim Chowdhury, “Negotiating State and NGO Politics”; Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women”; Milton et al., “Chemical Assault”; and Asaria et al. “Acid Burns.”

51. Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women”; and Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

52. Asaria et al., “Acid Burns”; and Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

53. Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women.”

54. Mannan et al., “Psychosocial Outcomes.”

55. Ahmad, “Acid Attacks on Women”; and Halim Chowdhury, “Negotiating State and NGO Politics.”

56. Wesson, “A Situational Assessment.”

57. Mannan et al., “Cases of Chemical Assault”; and Milton et al., “Chemical Assault.”

58. Faga et al., “Sulphuric Acid Burned Women.”

59. Mannan et al., “Psychosocial Outcomes”; and Halim Chowdhury, “Negotiating State and NGO Politics.”

60. Dickson-Swift et al., “Doing Sensitive Research.”

61. McCann et al., “Building Agility”; and Wilson and Ferch, “Enhancing Resilience.”

62. London, “Organizational Support”; and McCann et al., “Building Agility.”

63. Reivich et al., “Master Resilience Training.”

64. Moenkemeyer et al., “Innovator Resilience.”

65. Masten, “Ordinary Magic.”

66. Tugade and Fredrickson, “Resilient Individuals”; and Masten, “Ordinary Magic"; Fredrickson et al., "What good are Positive Emotions in Crisis.”

67. Alvesson and Sköldberg, Reflexive Methodology; and Freshwater and Rolfe, “Critical Reflexivity.”

68. Cunliffe, “On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner,” 408–409.

69. Clark and Walker, “Research Ethics.”

70. Sharma et al., “The Problem of Rape.”

71. “Analysis – South Asia’s Growing Modernity.”

72. Ellsberg and Heise, “Bearing Witness.”

73. Andersson et al., “Collecting Reliable Information.”

74. Ahman, “Acid Attacks.”

75. Abrahams, “Ethics in Counselling.”

76. Folkman, “Stress, Coping, and Hope”; and Riskind, “Links.”

77. Snyder et al., “The Will and the Ways,” 570–571.

78. Hayes, “Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Science.”

79. Williams and Lynn, “Acceptance.”

80. Hayes, “Acceptance, Mindfulness, and Science.”

81. Williams and Lynn, “Acceptance.”

82. Tremblay et al., “Learning Reflexively,” 3.

83. Cornwall and Brock, “What do Buzzwords Do?,” 1045.

84. Liamputtong, Researching the Vulnerable.

85. Silva-Martinez and Murty, “Ethics and Cultural Competence.”

86. Escobar, “Beyond the Third World.”