2,555
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

‘Barbarising’ China in American trade war discourse: the assault on Huawei

Pages 1436-1454 | Received 17 Mar 2020, Accepted 18 Feb 2021, Published online: 22 Mar 2021
 

Abstract

How is the legitimation of the American trade war with China discursively managed and conferred in recent American political discourse? This paper critically examines this under-explored question in the current literature. Taking cues from critical international theory and its insight on discourse and foreign policy, I start by historicising the discursive practices, which I call ‘barbarising China’, in the construction of civilisation vs barbarism as a hierarchical opposition. Mapping authoritarian China onto this historically contingent liberal civilisational edifice, I argue, has prepared the ground for American political action in the trade war. Through a critical analysis of how China has been constructed as a ‘barbarian’ economic aggressor in recent American political discourse, I further argue that the ‘political reality’ and ‘knowledge’ this discursive practice produces serves not only the political imperative of legitimising American trade war policy choices, but also a particular need of the ‘civilised’ hegemon to legitimise its power and practices beyond the trade war. Through a close examination of a coordinated assault on Huawei, I illustrate how ‘barbarising’ China has been discursively done as an integral part of the trade war and assert that ‘barbarising’ China has become indispensable in American strategy to sustain its precarious hegemony.

Acknowledgements

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 13th Pan-European Conference on International Relations at Sofia, Bulgaria, in September 2019. I thank in particular Peter Wilson for his critical and constructive comments on this paper at and after the panel discussions. I also express my thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on and thoughtful suggestions for the revision of this paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Yongjin Zhang

Yongjin Zhang is currently Professor of International Politics at the University of Bristol. Before his appointment at Bristol, he held teaching and research posts at Oxford University, Australian National University and the University of Auckland in New Zealand as well as the Institute of International Politics in Beijing, China. His publications have appeared in Review of International Studies, European Journal of International Relations, Millennium, International Affairs, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Journal of Contemporary China, and The China Quarterly, among others.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.