2,060
Views
134
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Creativity and urban governance

Pages 87-102 | Published online: 25 Sep 2008
 

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between ‘creativity’ and ‘innovation’, and the forms and practices of ‘governance’ in an urban context. It examines, in particular, the ‘double’ creativity of governance, both in terms of its potential to foster creativity in social and economic dynamics and to creatively transform its own capacities. It argues that there is no simple equation between the characteristics of a ‘creative city’ and a ‘creative’ mode of urban governance. Instead, the article advocates a multi-level approach to the dimensions of urban governance through which to identify qualities of governance activity, which, in specific contexts, have the potential to encourage creativity and innovation. The article first develops three meanings of creativity and outlines the way these are related to governance activity. A three-level approach to the interacting dimensions of governance is then presented, linking episodes, processes and cultures. This approach is then developed into an evaluative framework through which the creative potentialities of emergent properties of governance practices in specific situations can be explored. In conclusion, the article comments on the kinds of governance infrastructures which may have the capacity to release imaginative and innovative activities in city regions, the kinds of interventions which may help to transform such capacity and the imaginative resources and mobilising power which may help successful innovations to spread from experiment to ‘mainstream’.

Acknowledgments

This article is a modified version of a paper given at a workshop on Creativity, Culture and Urban Development, Menaggio, October 2002. It was also the basis of a presentation to the Conference Cities, Urbanity and Urban Interventions, February 2003, to ECPR Workshop 21, Assessing Emergent Forms of Governance: European Public Policies Beyond the ‘Institutional Void’, Edinburgh, March 2003, and the Nordic Symposium Local Planning and Change, Lillehammer, August 2003. My thanks to all the commentators for their contribution to this discussion.

Notes

Patsy Healey, Global Urban Research Centre, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. Tel: 44 (0)1668 281121; E-mail: [email protected].

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Patsy Healey

Patsy Healey, Global Urban Research Centre, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK. Tel: 44 (0)1668 281121; E-mail: [email protected].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.