![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Summary
Recent publication of an evidence-based clinical guideline by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG Citation) for invasive testing in pregnancy stimulated a review of our prenatal diagnosis counselling service. This coincided with a reduction in the hours worked by obstetric trainees and a need to streamline antenatal care. We arranged for a senior midwife (KE) with extensive experience in general midwifery and fetal medicine to undergo additional training in counselling for amniocentesis. She then took over the running of the counselling service supported by an in-house care pathway. She had open access to a consultant (RF) for advice. A review of the case notes of 60 consecutive women who attended for counselling showed that the midwife followed the guidelines extremely closely both in terms of process and quality of the documentation. A total of 58 of the women were counselled solely by the midwife-practitioner. Only two required additional counselling by the consultant. Of a subset of 27 women surveyed by telephone questionnaire, only two (7.4%) were surprised to have been counselled by a midwife; 25 (93%) said the counselling was excellent or good; 17 (63%) said they would prefer to see a midwife in any future pregnancy and only one woman said she would prefer to see a doctor.
