Outpatient cervical ripening in a district general hospital: a five-year retrospective cohort study

Abstract

The number of women undergoing induction of labour has risen steadily in recent years. Outpatient induction is becoming more common in the UK in response to the required increase in resources, although evidence supporting its safety is lacking. We reviewed the notes of low-risk women presenting for outpatient cervical ripening using prostaglandins over a five-year period, and compared our neonatal and maternal outcomes to local and national data. Of the 502 eligible women, 400 underwent outpatient treatment. Most women returned early, in labour. There were no foetal, neonatal or maternal deaths, and our neonatal morbidity compared favourably with local rates. Mode of delivery and major maternal complication rates were comparable to national maternity indicators. We conclude that outpatient cervical ripening following careful case selection does not appear to increase neonatal or maternal mortality or morbidity. It offers patients an alternative to traditional inpatient induction and may improve allocation of hospital resources.

Impact statement

• We present a retrospective cohort study of neonatal and maternal outcomes in 502 women selected for outpatient cervical ripening for postmaturity at Bedford Hospital over the five-year period from 2010 to 2015.

• This study was conceived following a previous publication in this journal from Bedford Hospital in 2002 by Neale et al., which described the outcomes of 100 women who underwent outpatient cervical ripening. Our conclusions compare the results from the two studies.

• Out of our combined sample of 602 women, 491 were discharged home following administration of prostaglandins. This represents the largest sample size in the published literature on outpatient induction of labour, which was first undertaken in our unit in 1998 and is now widely practiced within the UK.

• Several publications, including the 2013 Cochrane review by Kelly et al. and a recent large survey of practice (Sharp et al. 2016) have highlighted the paucity of available data regarding the safety of this procedure as an outpatient. We therefore hope that the results of our study will be of interest to many maternity units who currently undertake or are considering to provide the facility for outpatient cervical ripening as a prelude to induction of labour.

Keywords:

• Outpatient induction of labour
• outpatient cervical ripening
• induction for postdates
• induction for postmaturity
• prostaglandins for induction of labour

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the midwives of Bedford Hospital and in particular the DAU, for their support over the last 18 years. We are grateful to the medical records department for facilitating access to patient notes. Ethical approval was not sought as data was originally collected for the purpose of ongoing audit. Patient records were anonymised at the point of data collection.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.