137
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigation of copeptin levels in foetal congenital central nervous system anomalies

 

Abstract

Copeptin has been shown to be associated with central nervous system pathologies. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum CCP levels and central nervous system (CNS) anomalies. In this case-control study, those at 9–14 weeks of gestation serum levels of copeptin, were assessed in pregnant women whose foetuses subsequently developed CNS anomalies (group 1: n = 60) and compared with gestational age-matched pregnant women who exhibited normal pregnancy outcomes (group 2: n = 48). The mean copeptin levels were 1.58 ± 0.40 ng/mL and 1.11 ± 0.36 ng/mL in the CNS anomalies and control groups, respectively (p < .0001). An increased level of copeptin independently predicts development of CNS anomalies, suggesting that copeptin can be used for prediction and discrimination of CNS anomalies in normal pregnancies at 9–14 weeks of gestation.

    Impact statement

  • What is already known on this subject? There is no test or method to diagnose CNS anomalies in the first trimester of pregnancy. This study presents the first and new information on the relationship between serum copeptin levels and central nervous system anomalies in pregnant women whose foetuses subsequently developed CNS anomalies.

  • What do the results of this study add? I have strongly demonstrated differences in maternal CPP levels between CNS anomalous pregnancies and healthy controls.

  • What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It has been thought that copeptin appears to be an ideal marker for central nervous system anomaly prediction at 9–14 weeks of gestational age and if confirmed in larger prospective studies. Finally, these results could not be used as parameters for prenatal CNS screening. Advanced studies, well-structured and conducted on larger populations are needed to investigate the issue further.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the participants for their interests. No individual and organisation have made a substantive contribution to this manuscript.

Disclosure statement

The author of this manuscript states that there is no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.