(Trans)lating Identity: Exploring Discursive Strategies for Navigating the Tensions of Identity Gaps

Abstract

This study explored the formation and expression of gender identity among 19 self-identified transgender individuals through the use of qualitative, in-depth interviews. Through the lens of the Communication Theory of Identity (CTI), we examined how trans* individuals form and perform gender identity, the tensions produced between identity frames, and the discursive strategies used to navigate those tensions. We identified the manifestation of three specific identity gaps: personal-enacted, personal-relational, and enacted-relational. Furthermore, we discovered four discursive strategies previously recognized for navigating tensions that emerge from identity gaps: closeted enactment, passing, disengagement, and label changing, and we identified a fifth discursive strategy—hyper-engagement—used to navigate these tensions. Results revealed that these identity layers and discursive strategies collaboratively manifest and coalesce in response to specific communicative contexts. Our results are discussed within the resounding call for greater understanding of trans* identity formation and expression.

Keywords:

• Communication Theory of Identity
• Identity Gap
• Trans*
• Transgender

Funding

This research was, in part, supported by a General Research Fund (GRF) grant (Award #2301864) from the University of Kansas.

Notes

[1] We use the term “trans*” to describe those individuals who self-identify within the umbrella term, “transgender,” or some derivative. We understand this term as a descriptor for individuals whose gender identity transcends, breaks, transgresses, cuts through, or otherwise deviates from traditionally established gender categories (see Green, 2004; Sears, 2005). Additionally, we situate trans* identity in opposition to cisgender identity or a gender identity that coincides with the socially acceptable gendered expectations associated with biological sex.

[2] We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to K. H. for her initial help in conceptualizing and conducting interviews for this project.

[3] All participants have been provided with a pseudonym to help protect anonymity.

Additional information

Funding

This research was, in part, supported by a General Research Fund (GRF) grant (Award #2301864) from the University of Kansas.