This essay suggests a critical approach to the rhetoric of the American Revolution by focusing on the notion of myth and by examining the persuasive literature of Francis Hopkinson. Because myth‐making tends to modify the world view of the revolutionaries and to construct a shared ideology, it can have a profound influence on the shaping of a national self‐consciousness and creating a national ethos. At the same time, revolutionary rhetoric attacks the myths of the old order, weakening traditional attachments and promoting a new national identity.
The myth‐making functions of the rhetoric of the American revolution: Francis Hopkinson as a case study
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.