The current status of the research about nonverbal behavior is disappointing. The authors critically examine fourteen representative studies and identify three compelling conceptual problems: inadequate grounding of studies; insufficient justification for procedures; and an outdated perspective on theory‐building, Further, the authors specify implications and solutions for these weaknesses. A new framework for the development of theories about nonverbal behavior is proposed and explicated. Three distinct but interrelated positions are involved: personal construct theory; the action/ movement distinction; and the perspective on rules.
Studies of nonverbal behavior: An evaluation and recommendation
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.