In arguing that the development of a rhetorical theory for social movements is a lost cause, the authors examine two major questions: (1) how are movements different from other forms of collective behavior, and (2) do these differences create rhetorical differences? An analysis of the loading works in rhetoric on social movements leads to the conclusion that movements are not inherently different from other forms of collective behavior in their rhetorical activities, thus there is no need for a theory of the rhetoric of social movements.
Social movement theory: A dead end
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.