A commentary on Indvik and Fitzpatrick's study of relationship defining communication

Abstract

This commentary argues that Indvik and Fitzpatrick's article, “Perceptions of Inclusion, Affiliation, and Control in Five Interpersonal Relationships,” presents an inappropriate conceptual and methodological approach to the study of relationship defining communication. Problems are most evident in: (1) the domain isolated to represent the themes of inclusion, control, and affection; and (2) the inattention to the interdependence established with communication between relationship partners.

Key concepts:

• Relational communication
• affection
• control
• inclusion
• dyadic interaction