This essay is an attempt to illustrate an alternative conceptualization of what is considered “science.” The systemic epistemology introduced by Bateson and others is described as an equally viable complement to traditional epistemological orientations. The distinction between the two orientations is the recognition, within the systemic epistemology, of the interventive role of the observer. A specific model is introduced as providing a working method for conducting research within the systemic epistemology. This model is borrowed from the field of systemic family therapy where intervention in social systems is celebrated and accepted. This model, although clinical in orientation, offers useful guidelines for developing research programs which acknowledge social intervention.
Accepting research as social intervention: Implications of a systemic epistemology
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related Research Data
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.