Real jurors in actual felony trials completed a set of personality questionnaires including measures of Disclosiveness, Willingness to Communicate, and Communication Apprehension subscales for Friend and Meeting. Empaneled and excused jurors were examined for individual differences. As predicted, empaneled jurors had significantly higher disclosiveness scores, particularly with respect to positive disclosiveness, than excused jurors. Understanding communication traits significantly improves one's ability to predict jury selection. Jury selection appears to be partially a function of personality, rather than just a function of case relevant variables. This has important ramifications for establishing whether juries are fair cross representations of their communities.
Disclosiveness, willingness to communicate, and communication apprehension as predictors of jury selection in felony trials
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
Academic Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?
Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.