Recreation Specialization and Site Choice Among Vehicle-Based Campers

Abstract

Recreation specialization theory predicts that individuals will differ in their physical, management, and social setting preferences. Few studies, however, support the hypothesis that individuals choose recreation settings consistent with their level of specialization. This study examined the association between behavioral, cognitive, and affective dimensions of specialization and site choice among vehicle-based campers in Alberta, Canada. Data were collected using on-site interviews and a mail survey. Campers at unmanaged sites (no facilities and services) had higher centrality scores, had greater familiarity with the site and more experience with unmanaged sites, and a higher level of bush skill than campers at managed sites. An ordered multinomial logit model showed that the more familiar individuals were with the site and campground type, the higher the level of bush skill, and the more important and central camping was in an individual's life, the greater the probability of choosing a campground type that required a higher degree of self-reliance and decreased dependence on facilities and services. Higher household income increased the probability of camping at managed sites, suggesting that income might limit the expression of specialization by constraining choice to affordable options.

Keywords:

• camping
• enduring involvement
• recreation specialization
• site choice

Funding for this study was provided by Sunpine Forest Products Ltd., Sundre, Alberta. The author thanks E. Gluck, B. Shapansky, and D. Watson for technical assistance.

Notes

^a Rated on a 5-point scale where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.

^b Items were reverse coded.

^a Any means that do not share a letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 using Tukey's studentized range (HSD) test.