Evidence suggests that leisure activities can be used as a means for coping with stress, but how leisure is used as an effective way to regulate difficult tasks is still unclear. Self-Determination Theory was used as a theoretical framework to propose two distinct approaches to regulatory leisure coping: the Planned-Breather Leisure Coping Style and the Avoidant Leisure Coping Style. The two proposed dimensions were tested and supported using a new scale with a university student population. Findings obtained in these studies suggested that regulatory orientation in a particular context was distinctively associated with the two proposed leisure coping styles and to different affective consequences following the regulation of a difficult task.
Acknowledgments
Author Note: This research was facilitated through doctoral scholarship from SSHRC (Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada) attributed to the first author.
Notes
*p < .05.
**p < .01.
*p < .05.
**p < .01.