Impact of Ocean Mean Dynamic Topography on Satellite Data Assimilation

Abstract

The response of an eddy-permitting ocean model to changes imposed by the use of different mean dynamic topographies (MDT) is analyzed in a multivariate assimilation context, allowing the evaluation of this impact, not only on the surface circulation, but also on the interior ocean representation. The assimilation scheme is a reduced-order sequential Kalman filter (SEEK). In a first set of experiments, high resolution sea surface temperature, along-track sea surface height and sea surface salinity from climatology are assimilated into a 1/3° resolution North and Tropical Atlantic version of the HYCOM model. In a second experiment, in situ profile data are assimilated in addition to the surface measurements.

The first set of experiments illustrates that important differences in the representation of the horizontal model circulation pattern are related to differences in the MDT used. The objective of assimilation is to improve the representation of the 3D ocean state. However, the imperfect representation of the mean dynamic topography appears to be an important limiting factor with regard to the degree of realism obtained in the simulated flow.

Vertical temperature and salinity profiles are key observations to drive a general circulation ocean model toward a more realistic state. The second set of experiments shows that assimilating them in addition to sea surface measurements is a far from trivial exercise. A specific difficulty is due to inconsistencies between the dynamic topography diagnosed from in situ observations and that diagnosed from sea surface height. These two fields obtained from different data sources do not contain exactly the same information. In order to overcome this difficulty, a strategy is proposed and validated.

Keywords:

• ocean circulation
• satellite altimetry
• dynamic topography
• data assimilation

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted within the framework of the TOPAZ project (Grant EVK3-2000-00601). We would like to thank Eric Chassignet (RSMAS) for providing the model configuration and the MICOM mean sea surface, Fabrice Hernandez and Eric Greiner (CLS) for MDT1 data, Pascal Legrand (LPO/IFREMER) for MDT2 data, and Catherine Maillard (SYSMER/IFREMER) for the XBT database.

Notes

¹The prescribed reference σ_β values are: 19.5, 20.25, 21.0, 21.75, 22.5, ¹23.25, 24.0, 24.77, 25.28, 25.77, 26.18, 26.57, 26.8, 27.03, 27.22, 27.38, 27.52, 27.64, 27.74, 27.82, 27.88, 27.94, 28.0, 28.06, 28.09 and 28.12.