97
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

In Situ Evaluation of Cr(VI) Bioavailability and Rhizosphere Effects in Reduced Cr-Contaminated Soil Based on Diffusive Gradients in Thin Films Technique

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 128-134 | Received 18 Aug 2023, Accepted 20 Nov 2023, Published online: 04 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

The transformation between Cr(III) and Cr(VI) occurs in Cr-contaminated soil, which can be regulated by root-soil interactions, under natural conditions. In situ investigation of the effectiveness of different reductants in reducing Cr(VI) to Cr(III), and thereby the reoccurrence risk in reduced Cr-contaminated soil, can improve the understanding of Cr biogeochemistry and toxicity. Traditional and high-resolution diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) were used to measure Cr(VI) availability and rhizosphere effect controlling the chemical behaviors of Cr(VI) in the rice rhizosphere microdomain. The Cr(VI) concentration in the soil solution (Csoln) of the rhizosphere region varied according to the reductant type and followed the order: Molasses > CaS4 >Fe(II). Rice root activity increased the Csoln in the rhizosphere region by 2.16 μg/L, 1.90 μg/L, and 1.08 μg/L for Fe(II), CaS4, and Molasses treatments, respectively. The Cr(VI) concentration measured by DGT (CDGT) in the reduced Cr-contaminated soils increased from 0.96–1.17 μg/L in the bulk region to 1.23–1.76 μg/L in rhizosphere region. The variation in the effective concentration of Cr(VI) (CE) was similar to that of Csoln in the rice rhizosphere microdomain. Csoln accounted for 14.71–19.36% of the CE, further suggesting that bioavailable Cr(VI) mainly originated from the replenishment from the solid phase. The sequence of the average Cr(VI) flux in the reduced Cr-contaminated soil was Molasses, CaS4, and Fe(II). Except for Molasses, there was no obvious Cr(III) in Fe(II) and CaS4. For Fe(II), a higher phosphate flux in the rhizosphere microdomain hindered Cr(VI) uptake. High-resolution imaging provides a theoretical basis for the bioavailability evaluation and remediation of Cr-contaminated soil. Compared with CaS4 and Molasses, Fe(II) was the most effective reductant for remediating Cr-contaminated soils.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFD1700700), Taishan Scholars Program, the Shandong Province Key R&D Program (2021CXGX010801), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No 21806074), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu province, China (No BK20180345), Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No CXGC2023F03).

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.