150
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Stimulation of Methanotroph Activity by Cu-Substituted Borosilicate Glass

, , , , &
Pages 1-10 | Received 21 Sep 2009, Accepted 08 Jan 2010, Published online: 07 Jan 2011
 

Abstract

Previous investigations have shown that bacteria can derive benefits from elements within mineral assemblages associated with/or proximal to their point of attachment; however to date, no study has shown a direct connection between mineral dissolution and the biological oxidation of the greenhouse gas methane (CH4). Here we investigate linkages between the Cu content of silicate glasses (Si-glasses) and CH4 oxidation rates in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, a type II methanotroph. A series of batch growth experiments were performed under varying solid phase Cu (0, 80, 200, 400, and 800 ppm Cu) and initial aqueous phase methane concentrations (40, 70, and 130 nM CH4). Under near equilibrium conditions, the release of Cu from the glasses increased in association with M. trichosporium OB3b activity. The acquisition of Cu from the glasses directly influenced CH4 oxidation rates of M. trichosporium OB3b, presumably by promoting the expression and activity of copper-containing particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), the most efficient MMO for methane oxidation produced. Highest CH4 oxidation rates were observed in glasses with 80 ppm Cu. However, rates generally displayed an inverted-U relationship with solid-phase Cu concentration; i.e., rates were lower with solid phase Cu concentrations < 80 ppm or > 200 ppm. We conclude that in situ methanotroph activity in soils and sediments is strongly influenced by ambient solid-phase Cu concentrations, which has important implications to interpreting greenhouse gas flux data in geologic settings.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Charles W. Knapp for instruction and advice on methanotroph culturing, Peter C. Burns for use of the Bruker D8 Discovery powder X-ray diffractometer, David Moore for assistance with the LEO 1550 field emission SEM, and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments. The authors also acknowledge support for this research from NSF Biogeosciences (EAR 0433980 awarded to Roberts and Graham), NSF Low Temperature Geochemistry and Geobiology (EAR 0750009 awarded to Fowle, Roberts and Graham, UK NERC (NE/F00608X/1 awarded to Graham), and KU Geology Associates (Fowle).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.