645
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Electrocoagulation

Treatment of dairy wastewater by electrocoagulation process: Advantages of combined iron/aluminum electrodes

, , &
Pages 2510-2527 | Received 23 Feb 2019, Accepted 28 Jun 2019, Published online: 15 Jul 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The objective was to assess the efficiency of electrode material in an electrocoagulation (EC) process for wastewater treatment by comparing the efficiency of aluminum (Al–Al), iron (Fe–Fe) and combined Fe–Al electrodes. The treatment of synthetic dairy wastewater, characterized by high levels of 5-day biological oxygen demand (BOD5) and chemical oxygen demand (COD), was used to compare electrode materials. Experimental results showed that all electrodes materials achieved the same final removal yield in the range of current studied (55% COD, 60% total organic carbon, 90% total nitrogen, and nearly 100% turbidity) when equilibrium was achieved. But at fixed current density and initial concentration of dairy waste, the Al–Al assembly exhibited the fastest elimination, whereas the slowest removal rate was observed with the Fe–Fe electrodes, even though adsorption was always the main removal mechanism. Finally, an Fe–Al system using an Fe anode with an Al cathode emerged as a techno-economic trade-off because of the low price of iron: both metals contributed to the removal of dairy waste, and the treatment time to achieve equilibrium values was closer to the Al–Al assembly at fixed current density. Moreover, experimental results proved the additivity of the mechanisms reported for Al–Al and Fe–Fe systems with Fe–Al.

Nomenclature

a=

current market price of electricity ($/kWh)

Al=

aluminium electrode

b=

current market price of electrode material ($/kg)

BOD5=

five-day biological oxygen demand (mg/L)

COD=

chemical oxygen demand (mg/L)

EC=

electrocoagulation

EDX=

energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy

EEC=

electrical energy consumption (kWh/m3)

EMC=

electrode material consumption (kg/m3)

F=

Faraday’s constant (9.65 104 C/equiv.)

Fe=

iron electrode

HPLC=

high-performance liquid chromatography

I=

current (A)

M=

molar mass of metal (g/mol)

mT=

theoretical quantity of consumed metal (g/h)

OC=

operating cost ($/m3)

SEM=

scanning electron microscopy

t=

electrolysis time (s)

TN=

total nitrogen

TOC=

total organic carbon

TSS=

total suspended solids (mg/L)

U=

cell potential (V)

V=

volume of treated water (m3)

z=

ion valence of metal

Greek letters

τ=

characteristic time (s)

Indices

Al=

refers to Al

eq=

equilibrium value

Fe=

refers to Fe

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge David Duchez for technical support and Jean-Pierre Cherré for SEM micrographs and EDX analysis. LABEX IMobS3 Innovative Mobility: Smart and Sustainable Solutions is gratefully acknowledged.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.