Abstract
Research in Australian business education continues to emphasise the importance of students learning teamwork as an integral part of the undergraduate curriculum. However, entrenched conceptual and practical confusion as to what the term ‘teamwork’ means and how it ought to be enacted remains a vexed issue capable of distorting and diminishing teamwork, learning and related pedagogy. In this paper, we critically re-examine the view that developing teamwork in an undergraduate business degree equips students for work in the real world. By focusing on the ‘real world’ metaphor-in-use in a cross-disciplinary business capstone subject, we interrogate the spatio-temporal dimensions of teamwork and its realist conceptions and performance. The research draws upon the perceptions of interviewed academics conducting teamwork activities in undergraduate business courses and the lived experiences of the authors. The findings highlight how the use of multiple models of teamwork, constructed by competing discourses and linked to the dualities and invocations constructed by ‘the real world’ metaphor, further exacerbate confusion. We suggest re-viewing and re-valuing student teamwork as the performance of situated, social practices opening new spaces for student teamwork, learning and pedagogical practice.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr Kathy Rudkin for her contributions to earlier ideas, the Faculty of Business for the funding received as part of a Faculty Teaching and Learning Grant and the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.
Notes
1. While the term ‘capstone subjects’ covers a range of different approaches and designs that are not necessarily designed around authentic student experiences, in this paper we follow van Acker and Bailey (Citation2011) who show the recent expansion in acceptance of such a conception.
2. Student feedback has been collected from the capstone unit, and while not relevant for this project on academic conceptions, interestingly, 60% used some direct or indirect conception of the real world when discussing their teamwork experiences.
3. The use of square brackets indicates the use of a citation from one of the interviews collected in the research project.
4. For example, when one speaks of a fighter or boxer as a tiger one does not assume that a tiger will enter the ring.