213
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A global optima search field division method for evolutionary algorithms

, &
Pages 1085-1104 | Received 14 May 2020, Accepted 04 Feb 2021, Published online: 13 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the deployment of a proposed search field division method (SFDM) within evolutionary algorithms (EAs) to enhance the capability of searching for the global optima in nonlinear problems. The proposed technique is benchmarked against the following eight widely-used single-modal, multi-modal, and unimodal benchmark functions: Sphere, Rosenbrock, Rastringin, Griewank, Ackley, Fletcher, Quartic, and Schwefel functions, and the outcome is compared to their standard EAs counterparts to validate the effectiveness of the deployed approach in EAs. In the proposed method, we apply three low, medium, high field divisions (1, 2, and 5) dimensions on nine different EAs simultaneously with two different scenarios, 10 and 100 variables, to reach the optimal solution. Then for the validity of our proposed SFDM technique, we examined the exploration-exploitation search space rates and diversity behavior. The results of the implementation of SFDM on eight benchmark test functions show that the consideration of dimensions using SFDM for EAs improves the outcomes of all nine tested EAs. In our proposed method, we find better compatibility with the integration of SFDM in the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm concerning searching for the optimum solution relative to the other EAs.

    Highlights

  • A novel Search Field Division Method (SFDM) for evolutionary algorithms.

  • Applying three field divisions (1, 2, and 5) dimensions on nine different Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) simultaneously to reach the optimal global solution.

  • The implementation of SFDM on eight benchmark functions shows significant improvement in all nine tested EAs.

  • In our proposed method, we find the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm has better compatibility with respect to the other EAs.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the respectful editors and anonymous reviewers for their very constructive comments to improve the quality of our paper.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1 See Eberhart and Yuhui Shi. (2001). (n.d.). Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications, and resources. Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546). doi:10.1109/cec.2001.934374; Shi, Y. (2012). Innovations and developments of swarm intelligence applications (pp. 1–398). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1592-2.

2 See Mirjalili S. (2019). Genetic algorithm. In Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks. Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 780). Springer; Mitsuo Gen and Runwei Cheng (1997). Genetic algorithms and manufacturing systems design (1st ed). John Wiley & Son, Inc.

3 See Das, S., Biswas, A., Dasgupta, S., and Abraham A. (2009). Bacterial foraging optimization algorithm: theoretical foundations, analysis, and applications. In A. Abraham, A. E. Hassanien, P. Siarry, & A. Engelbrecht (Eds.), Foundations of computational intelligence volume 3. Studies in computational intelligence, Vol. 203. Springer; Passino, K. M. (2012). Bacterial foraging optimization. In Y. Shi (Ed.), Innovations and developments of swarm intelligence applications (pp. 219–234). IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1592-2.ch013.

4 See Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., & Stutzle, T. (2006). Ant colony optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4), 28–39; Avi Ostfeld, Ant Colony Optimization: Methods and Applications. Published Feb 4th, 2011. IntechOpen, UK.

5 See Karaboga, D., & Akay, B. (2009). A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 214(1), 108–132. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2009.03.090

6 See U. K. Chakraborty, Advances Differential Evolution, Germany, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008. Series Volume143, eBook ISBN 978-3-540-68830-3.

7 See Hansen, N., Arnold, D. V., & Auger, A. (2015). Evolution strategies. In J. Kacprzyk & W. Pedrycz (Eds.), Springer handbook of computational intelligence. Springer handbooks. Springer.

8 See Guo, W., Chen, M., Wang, L., Mao, Y., & Wu, Q. (2017). A survey of biogeography-based optimization. Neural Computing & Application 28, 1909–1926. doi:10.1007/s00521-016-2179-x.

9 See Ambali, A., & Braae, M. (2000). PBIL algorithm implementation on microcontrollers. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 33(18), 247–252. doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)37151-3.

10 see (Bierlaire et al., Citation2010; Chen et al., Citation2019; Doye et al., Citation2004; Gawali et al., Citation2017; He et al., Citation2015; Lasdon et al., Citation2010; Maučec & Brest, Citation2019; Mete & Zabinsky, Citation2014; Nenavath et al., Citation2018; Ozdamar & Demirhan, Citation2000; Yavuz & Aydın, Citation2019; Zhang, Citation2020).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.