The effect of robot-assisted walking in different modalities on cardiorespiratory responses and energy consumption in patients with subacute stroke

ABSTRACT

Objectives

The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of robot-assisted walking in different modalities on cardiorespiratory responses and energy consumption in subacute stroke patients.

Methods

Our study consisted of 16 individuals between the ages of 18–65 years. Individuals diagnosed with hemiplegia after unilateral ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke constitute the stroke group. Eight subacute stroke individuals were included in the experimental group, and eight healthy individuals were included in the control group. Each participant tested on the Lokomat in three consecutive days in random sequence, with three tests: the first test: 100% guiding strength (GF)and 100% body weight support (BWS); the second test 80% GF, 50% BWS; the third test 60% GF, 30% BWS was achieved. Gas analyzer (Cosmed, Quark CPET, Italy) measurements were made with the help of a mask to evaluate the cardiorespiratory responses of the participants during all tests.

Results

In the comparison of the three test results of the two groups separately, the stroke group’s oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), tidal volume (VT), pulse reserve (HRR), calories burned per hour (EEh), Borg dyspnea values, control group’s VO2, VCO2, VE, HR, HRR, and EEh, Borg values were statistically significantly different (p < 0.005). It was seen that the third test results were significantly greater than the first and second test results (p < 0.005).

Discussion

By decreasing GF and BWS values during robot-assisted walking, adequate cardio-metabolic and energy response in both subacute stroke patients and healthy individuals could be achieved. These results show us that it is important to consider the cardiorespiratory function of the patient when choosing training protocols.

KEYWORDS:

• Stroke
• gait
• robotic rehabilitation
• cardiorespiratory functions
• gait analysis

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors..