59
Views
50
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Theory and Method

Testing Causality between Two Vectors in Multivariate Autoregressive Moving Average Models

, &
Pages 1082-1090 | Received 01 Aug 1990, Published online: 27 Feb 2012
 

Abstract

In the analysis of economic time series, a question often raised is whether a vector of variables causes another one in the sense of Granger. Most of the literature on this topic is concerned with bivariate relationships or uses finite-order autoregressive specifications. The purpose of this article is to develop a causality analysis in the sense of Granger for general vector autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models. We give a definition of Granger noncausality between vectors, which is a natural and simple extension of the notion of Granger noncausality between two variables. In our context, this definition is shown to be equivalent to a more complex definition proposed by Tjostheim. For the class of linear invertible processes, we derive a necessary and sufficient condition for noncausality between two vectors of variables when the latter do not necessarily include all the variables considered in the analysis. This result is then specialized to the class of stationary invertible ARMA processes. Further, relatively simple necessary and sufficient conditions are obtained for two important cases: (1) the case where the two vectors reduce to two variables inside a larger vector including other variables; and (2) the case where the two vectors embody all the variables considered. Test procedures for these necessary and sufficient conditions are discussed. Among other things, it is noted that the necessary and sufficient conditions for noncausality may involve singularities at which standard asymptotic regularity conditions do not hold. To deal with such situations, we propose a sequential approach that leads to bounds tests. Finally, the tests suggested are applied to Canadian money and income data. The tests are based on bivariate and trivariate models of changes in nominal income and two money stocks (M1 and M2). In contrast with the evidence based on bivariate models, we find from the trivariate model that money causes income unidirectionally.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.