Since the early 1980s, financialization has become an increasingly important trend in developed capitalist countries, with different timing, speed, and intensities in different countries. Rising inequality has been a major feature of this trend. Shares of wages in national income have declined and personal income inequality has increased. Against this background unsustainable demand and growth regimes have developed that dominated the major economies before the crisis: the ‘debt-led private demand boom’ and the ‘export-led mercantilist’ regime. The article applies this post-Keynesian approach to the macroeconomics of finance-dominated capitalism of three Baltic Sea countries, Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia, both for the pre-crisis and the post-crisis period. First, the macroeconomics of finance-dominated capitalism are briefly reiterated. Second, the financialization-distribution nexus is examined for the three countries. Third, macroeconomic demand and growth regimes are analyzed, both before and after the crisis.
For helpful comments, we would like to thank Rainer Kattel and two anonymous referees. Remaining errors are ours, of course.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1. We follow Epstein’s (Citation2005) widely quoted definition of financialization as ‘increasing [the] role of financial motives, financial markets, financial actors and financial institutions in the operation of the domestic and international economies.’
2. The terms ‘financialization’ and ‘finance-dominated capitalism’ are used interchangeably in this article.
3. Several econometric studies, partly with eclectically theoretical foundations, have confirmed some of these channels, too, as already reviewed in Hein (Citation2015). See recently, for example, Alvarez (Citation2015), Dünhaupt (Citation2016), Köhler, Guschanski, and Stockhammer (Citation2018), and Stockhammer (Citation2017).
5. Also, household debt-GDP ratios were at a very high and increasing level in this period (see ). However, these ratios are referring to gross debt and are therefore no safe indicator for the level of net indebtedness.
6. For more detailed analysis of financialization processes and of macroeconomic policies leading to the crisis in these countries, see for example Juuse (Citation2016) and Juuse and Kattel (Citation2013) for Estonia, Kazandziska (Citation2015) for Latvia, and Kattel (Citation2010) for the Baltic States.
7. For further discussions see Juuse (Citation2016), Kattel (Citation2010) and Kattel and Raudla (Citation2013), for example. Here is not the place to discuss these problems in detail.
Epstein, G. A. 2005. “Introduction: Financialization and the World Economy.” In Financialization and the World Economy, edited by G. A. Epstein, 3–16. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hein, E. 2015. “Finance-dominated Capitalism and Re-distribution of Income – A Kaleckian Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics39 (3): 907–934. doi:10.1093/cje/bet038.
Alvarez, I. 2015. “Financialization, Non-financial Corporations and Income Inequality: The Case of France.” Socio-Economic Review13: 449–475. doi:10.1093/ser/mwv007.
Köhler, K., A. Guschanski, and E. Stockhammer. 2018. “The Impact of Financialisation on the Wage Share. A Theoretical Clarification and Empirical Test.” Post Keynesian Economics Study Group Working Paper 1802. https://www.postkeynesian.net/working-papers/1802/
Stockhammer, E. 2017. “Determinants of the Wage Share. A Panel Analysis of Advanced and Developing Economies.” British Journal of Industrial Relations55: 3–33. doi:10.1111/bjir.12165.
Dutt, A. K. 2005. “Conspicuous Consumption, Consumer Debt and Economic Growth.” In Interactions in Analytical Political Economy. Theory, Policy and Applications, edited by M. Setterfield, 155–178. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Kapeller, J., and B. Schütz. 2014. “Debt, Boom, Bust: A Theory of Minsky-Veblen Cycles.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics36: 781–814. doi:10.2753/PKE0160-3477360409.
Kapeller, J., and B. Schütz. 2015. “Conspicuous Consumption, Inequality and Debt: The Nature of Consumption Driven Profit-led Regimes.” Metroeconomica66: 51–70. doi:10.1111/meca.2015.66.issue-1.
Kim, Y. K., M. Setterfield, and Y. Mei. 2014. “A Theory of Aggregate Consumption.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 11: 31–49.
Nishi, H. 2012. “Household Debt, Dynamic Stability, and Change in Demand Creation Patterns.” Review of Political Economy24: 607–622. doi:10.1080/09538259.2012.729933.
Palley, T. I. 1994. “Debt, Aggregate Demand, and the Business Cycle: An Analysis in the Spirit of Kaldor and Minsky.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics16: 371–390. doi:10.1080/01603477.1994.11489991.
Setterfield, M., and Y. K. Kim. 2016. “Debt Servicing, Aggregate Consumption, and Growth.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics36: 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2015.10.002.
Setterfield, M., and Y. K. Kim. 2017. “Household Borrowing and the Possibility of ‘consumption-driven, Profit-led Growth’.” Review of Keynesian Economics5: 43–60. doi:10.4337/roke.
Setterfield, M., Y. K. Kim, and J. Rees. 2016. “Inequality, Debt Servicing and the Sustainability of Steady State Growth.” Review of Political Economy28: 45–63. doi:10.1080/09538259.2015.1072919.
Juuse, E. 2016. “The Real Sector Developments in Estonia: Financialisation Effects behind the Transition Process.” In Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: Country Studies, edited by E. Hein, D. Detzer, and N. Dodig, 137–162. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Juuse, E., and R. Kattel. 2013. “Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crisis: The Case of Estonia.” FESSUD Studies in Financial Systems, No. 20. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Kazandziska, M. 2015. “Macroeconomic Policy Regimes in Emerging Markets: The Case of Latvia.” European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention 12 (3): 318–352.
Juuse, E. 2016. “The Real Sector Developments in Estonia: Financialisation Effects behind the Transition Process.” In Financialisation and the Financial and Economic Crises: Country Studies, edited by E. Hein, D. Detzer, and N. Dodig, 137–162. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kattel, R., and R. Raudla. 2013. “The Baltic Republics and the Crisis of 2008–2011.” Europe–Asia Studies65 (3): 426–449. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.779456.
Petra Dünhaupt is a researcher and lecturer at the Berlin School of Economics and Law (HWR) Berlin. She is a member of the Institute for International Political Economy Berlin (IPE), a corresponding member of the Turin Center on Emerging Economies (OEET) and a member of the Editorial Advisory Board of the Review of Political Economy. Her research focuses on financialization, income distribution and global value chains.
Eckhard Hein
Eckhard Hein is a Professor of Economics at the Berlin School of Economics and Law, the Co-Director of the Institute for International Political Economy Berlin (IPE), a Research Associate at the Levy Economics Institute at Bard College, a member of the coordination committee of the Research Network Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies (FMM), and a managing co-editor of the European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention. His research focuses on money, financial systems, distribution and growth, European economic policies and post-Keynesian macroeconomics.
Reprints and Corporate Permissions
Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page
How do I view content?
To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:
If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.