462
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Some Bryophytes Trigger Cytotoxicity of Stem Cell-like Population in 5-Fluorouracil Resistant Colon Cancer Cells

, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1012-1022 | Received 29 Jul 2020, Accepted 25 Apr 2021, Published online: 20 Jun 2021
 

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Cancer stem cells are known to play an important role in relapse, and metastases of the disease after chemotherapy. Investigation of new drugs, and their combinations targeting these cells and thus eliminating cancer is one of the most urgent needs of today’s chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of Bryophytes like Abietinella abietina (AA), Homolothecium sericeum (HS), Tortella tortuosa (TT), Syntrichia ruralis (SR), and Bryoerythrophyllum rubrum (BR) species extracted with ethyl alcohol on 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) resistant colorectal cancer cell lines (HCT116 and HT29). After extraction, stock solutions of bryophytes were prepared, and IC50 values were detected in drug-resistant cells obtained with 5-FU application. CD24+, CD44+/CD133+ surface markers and P‐glycoprotein (P-gp) mediated efflux were isolated from both 5-FU treated cells and analyzed using the flow cytometry. In all bryophyte-treated groups, the binding Rho123low (low Rho fluorescence) and Rhohigh (high Rho fluorescence) were sorted from 5-FU resistant HCT116, and HT-29 cells. All types of bryophytes were found cytotoxic. Bryophyte extract reduced the percentage of Rholow cells in cultures incubated with 5-FU. In summary, the implementation of these bryophytes might be regarded as an effective approach for treatment of colorectal cancer due to their cytotoxic effect that decreases the recurrence of the disease.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2021.1933098

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to Abdullah Yılmaz for helping with flow cytometric analysis.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author Contribution Statement

D. Ö. and D. S. K. planned to work. K. C. provided the bryophyte samples. E. M. A. and A. E. took part in some methods. D. Ö. took part in conducting the experiments and writing part of the whole study. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Istanbul University External Partners project with Kastamonu University with the number TKD-2018-26955.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.