126
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Associations of Novel Lifestyle- and Whole Foods-Based Inflammation Scores with Incident Colorectal Cancer Among Women

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 1356-1369 | Received 14 Oct 2020, Accepted 11 Jun 2021, Published online: 23 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Background

Chronic inflammation, associated with lifestyle and dietary factors, may contribute to colorectal carcinogenesis. To address this, we investigated associations of previously validated, inflammation biomarker panel-weighted, novel, 4-component lifestyle (LIS) and 19-component predominately whole foods-based dietary (DIS) inflammation scores with incident colorectal cancer (CRC) in the prospective Iowa Women’s Health Study (IWHS; 1986–2012; n = 34,254, of whom 1,632 developed CRC).

Methods

We applied the published scores’ components’ weights, summed the weighted components to constitute the scores (higher scores reflect a higher balance of pro-inflammatory exposures), and investigated LIS- and DIS-CRC associations using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

The multivariable-adjusted hazards ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CRC among participants in the highest relative to the lowest LIS and DIS quintiles were 1.47 (1.26, 1.72; Ptrend < 0.01) and 1.07 (0.91, 1.25; Ptrend = 0.22), respectively. The corresponding findings for distal colon cancers were HR 1.78 (1.29, 2.47) and HR 1.34 (0.98, 1.84), respectively. Among those in the highest relative to the lowest joint LIS/DIS quintile, the HR for CRC was 1.60 (95% CI 1.30, 1.98).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that a more pro-inflammatory lifestyle, alone and jointly with a more pro-inflammatory diet, may be associated with higher CRC risk.

Disclosure Statement

None of the authors has a conflict of interest to disclose. The findings and conclusions contained within are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect positions or policies of the National Cancer Institute or the Wilson P. and Anne W. Franklin Foundation. The National Cancer Institute and the Wilson P. and Anne W. Franklin Foundation had no influence on the analysis and interpretation of the data, the decision to submit the manuscript for publication, or the writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the US National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health under Grant R01 CA039742 (support to DeAnn Lazovich), and the Anne and Wilson P. Franklin Foundation (support to Roberd M. Bostick).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.