133
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Transferrin and Prealbumin Identify Esophageal Cancer Patients with Malnutrition and Poor Prognosis in Patients with Normal Albuminemia: A Cohort Study

, , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 3546-3555 | Received 08 Nov 2021, Accepted 13 May 2022, Published online: 02 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to analyze whether serum prealbumin and transferrin have a higher sensitivity than albumin for detecting malnutrition and predicting survival in esophageal cancer patients. A total of 212 patients were prospectively enrolled. Serum albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The association of nutritional markers with survival was analyzed. We found that malnutrition was presented in 44.5% of the patients, while 56.6% were unaware of their body weight change. The area under the curve for diagnosing malnutrition was largest for prealbumin, followed by transferrin and albumin, with optimal breakpoints of 21 mg/dL, 206 mg/dL, and 4.3 g/dL, respectively, for diagnosing malnutrition. The diagnostic sensitivity for malnutrition was 34.1-63.4% with a single marker and this increased to 80.5% with all 3 markers. In patients with normal albuminemia (≥ 4.3 g/dL), a low level of prealbumin and/or transferrin predicted malnutrition and poor prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that a low level of the nutritional marker was an independent poor prognostic factor. In conclusion, serum prealbumin and transferrin outperformed albumin in identifying esophageal cancer patients with malnutrition and poor prognosis. Checking all three markers will help with the early diagnosis of malnutrition and enable timely intervention.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Ethics Approval

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (B-BR-106-082).

Consent to Participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before their inclusion in the study.

Authors’ Contributions

Conceptualization, WL Chang; Methodology, WL Chang; Formal Analysis, WL Chang; Investigation, WL Chang; Resources, MY Lin, FC Lin, N J Chiang, and WW Lai; Data Curation, WL Chang; Writing – Original Draft Preparation, HC Chiang; Writing – Review & Editing, WL Chang; Visualization, HC Chiang and WL Chang; Supervision, WL Chang and BS Sheu; Project Administration, WL Chang; Funding Acquisition, YC Wang and BS Sheu. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 107-2314-B-006-016 and MOST 109-2320-B-006-033), Taiwan.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.