68
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Skeletal Muscle Mass Index in Esophageal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

, , , &
Pages 3592-3600 | Received 16 Nov 2021, Accepted 07 Jun 2022, Published online: 22 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

The prognostic role of pretreatment skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) has been verified in several types of cancers. However, it remains unclear whether pretreatment SMI is a valuable prognostic indicator in esophageal cancer. The aim of the present study was to identify the prognostic value of pretreatment SMI in esophageal cancer. PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies up to November 10, 2021. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined to assess the association of pretreatment SMI with the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of esophageal cancer patients. In total, 17 studies involving 2441 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that a lower SMI was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09–1.27, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.10–2.88, P = 0.019). In addition, subgroup analysis based on treatment (surgery vs. nonsurgery), tumor type (squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma) and cutoff value of SMI showed similar results. The present findings demonstrated that pretreatment SMI is an independent prognostic indicator for esophageal cancer patients, and patients with a lower pretreatment SMI are more likely to have a worse prognosis. However, additional prospective high-quality studies are needed to verify the above findings.

Disclosure Statement

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Authors’ Contributions

Mei Yang and Guowei Che conceived and designed the analyses. Li Yao, Lei Wang and Yuanyuan Yin performed the literature search and selection, collected data, and wrote this article. Li Yao performed statistical analyses. All authors contributed substantially to its revision.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.