ABSTRACT
Statements containing quantity information are commonplace. Although there is literature explaining the way in which quantities themselves are conveyed in numbers or words (e.g., many, probably), there is less on the effects of different types of quantity description on the processing of surrounding text. Given that quantity information is usually conveyed to alter our understanding of a situation (e.g., to convey information about a risk), our understanding of the rest of the quantified statement is clearly important. In this article texts containing quantified statements expressed numerically versus verbally are compared in two text change experiments to assess how the entire quantified noun phrase is encoded in each case. On the basis of the results it is argued that numerical quantifiers place focus on the size of a subset, whereas verbal quantifiers are better integrated with nouns leading to more focus on the subset itself.
Acknowledgments
I owe a huge debt of gratitude to Tony Sanford, not only for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper but for many years of collaboration on this and many other topics in psychology. I am also grateful to the following students who helped to run the three experiments reported here: Robin Callaghan-Creighton, Daniella Chrysochou, Sean Thomson, Rory Vockes-Dudgeon, and Laura Ward.