Text-Belief Consistency Effects in L2 Readers

ABSTRACT

Readers are expected to construct balanced mental representations of socioscientific issues discussed across controversial documents. However, readers tend to be biased toward documents that present belief-consistent perspectives and tend to refute documents that argue against their stance (text-belief consistency effect). Published studies on text-belief consistency effects have used imbalanced designs with all participants typically endorsing one standpoint in the controversy. The present experiment used a balanced design to examine the text-belief consistency in Iranian students of English as a foreign language and to investigate the extent that prior knowledge moderates the effect. Eighty-two students read two texts on an applied linguistics issue (native vs. non-native speakers as English as a foreign language teachers). Based on their performance on a prior beliefs measure, participants were assigned to three groups that varied in agreement to the stance of the texts. A recognition task was used to measure their situation-model strength and text-base strength. The results revealed a large text-belief consistency effect. Participants constructed stronger situation models for the text that communicated belief-consistent information compared with those who read the text that communicated belief-inconsistent information. No difference was found for text-base representation. Although prior knowledge was found to exert a significant positive effect on the strength of participants’ situation-model representations, it did not moderate the text-belief consistency effect.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the participants and the colleagues who helped with collecting the data for the study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The research reported in this study was funded by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Germany.