129
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparative composition of the snake assemblage from Sierras de Ventania mountain range, east-central Argentina

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 44-50 | Received 22 Mar 2019, Accepted 26 Sep 2019, Published online: 14 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The composition of a snake assemblage from an orographic island in east-central Argentina, the Sierras de Ventania mountain chain, was analyzed. The aim was to determine the biogeographic resemblance to other snake assemblages from neighboring regions. Species composition of each region was obtained from an exhaustive review of the literature, and both fieldwork and museum records. The higher biogeographic resemblance of the Sierras de Ventania occurred with the Sierras de Tandilia and the Coastal Dunes. These regions formed a well-defined group according to their snake assemblages. On the other hand, the Sierras de Lihué Calel linked to the Sierras de Ventania, and also to the rest of the compared regions, at very low values of biogeographic resemblance. The results obtained in this study contrasted with the classic zoogeographic scheme. Snake assemblages allowed recognizing a more significant division between Central and Pampean domains. In this scheme, the limit between these two regions moved to the southwest of the classical scheme; therefore the Sierras de Ventania was part of the Pampean domain. Also, the recognition of the Subtropical domain was evident, as well as its faunistic link with the Pampean domain.

Geolocation Information

Study Area 1 (point): 33°48ʹS, 59°17ʹW; Study Area 2 (point): 33°18’S, 60°13ʹW; Study Area 3 (point): 34°14’S, 58°53ʹW; Study Area 4 (point): 34°47’S, 57°59ʹW; Study Area 5 (point): 36°00’S, 57°18ʹW; Study Area 6 (point): 35°44’S, 58°43ʹW; Study Area 7 (point): 36°56’S, 60°09ʹW; Study Area 8 (point): 37°50’S, 58°05ʹW; Study Area 9 (point): 38°40’S, 59°06ʹW; Study Area 10 (point): 38°03’S, 62°02ʹW; Study Area 11 (point): 37°57’S, 65°39ʹW.

Acknowledgments

We thank the herpetologists Diego Barrasso, Santiago Nenda and Sergio Rosset for their help during fieldwork and specimen collection, and Marcela Quetglas who read a preliminary version of the manuscript. We are grateful to the Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible (OPDS, Buenos Aires) for the collecting permits. We thank curators of collections Julián Faivovich (MACN – Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales, Buenos Aires) and Sonia Kretzschmar (FML – Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán) for loaning specimens in their care.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas [CONICET, Argentina]; Secretaria de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad Nacional de La Plata [SECYT, UNLP, project 11/N823]; Secretaría de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba [SECYT, UNC, project 05/I460].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.