68
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Validation of Simplified Visual Acuity Testing Protocols in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

, &
Pages 247-252 | Received 09 Feb 2017, Accepted 08 Mar 2017, Published online: 27 Apr 2017
 

ABSTRACT

High- and low-contrast visual acuity (HCVA, LCVA) are potential quantitative markers of neurological dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The complex nature and duration of gold standard (GS) protocols precludes widespread use in neurology settings. This study compares simplified to GS visual acuity (VA) protocols. Monocular HCVA and LCVA were measured in ALS (n = 10) and control (n = 4) subjects using six protocols, varying by two chart and three refraction methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients between simplified and GS protocols ranged from 0.83 to 0.98 (HCVA, excellent agreement) and 0.56 to 0.75 (LCVA, moderate agreement). Differences between LCVA and GS protocols exceeded test-retest reliability. Simplified HCVA protocols using LCD (liquid crystal display) tablet charts and/or pinhole correction produced valid measurements. None of the modified LCVA testing protocols produced valid measurements.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants K12 EY 02147 and K23 EY 024345 and Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted awards to University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Stanford Department of Ophthalmology. King-Devick testing software was provided free of charge by the manufacturer. No funding agency was involved in the conceptualisation, design, implementation, or analysis of this study.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants K12 EY 02147 and K23 EY 024345 and Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted awards to University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences and Stanford Department of Ophthalmology. King-Devick testing software was provided free of charge by the manufacturer. No funding agency was involved in the conceptualisation, design, implementation, or analysis of this study.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.