Publication Cover
Orbit
The International Journal on Orbital Disorders, Oculoplastic and Lacrimal Surgery
Volume 41, 2022 - Issue 3
231
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Investigation

Orbital and periorbital dermoid cysts: a retrospective analysis of 270 lesions

, , &
Pages 341-345 | Received 05 Dec 2020, Accepted 27 Mar 2021, Published online: 13 May 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To report the clinical characteristics and intraoperative findings of periorbital and orbital dermoid cysts and their relationship to location and rupture.

Methods

Retrospective review of 270 cases with orbital or periorbital dermoid cysts that presented over a period of 11 years. Patients were included if diagnosis of dermoid cyst was made by histopathologic analysis. Clinical characteristics and operative outcomes were recorded and analyzed with Chi-squared analyses or univariate regression. Multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to assess predictors of location and rupture.

Results

Dermoids frequently occurred unilaterally and were more frequently described as mobile (61.5%), followed by fixed (30.8%), and partially fixed (7.7%). Dermoid rigidity was most commonly described as firm (75.5%), followed by cystic, soft, and rubbery. The most common dermoid location was superotemporal (60.4%). On Chi-squared analysis, superotemporal lesions were less likely to have orbital extension than non-superotemporal lesions (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.70, p = .01), less likely to undergo CT (OR 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06–0.41, p < .01) or MRI (OR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.13–0.41, p < .01), more likely to be described as mobile (OR 2.91, 95% CI: 1.32–6.43, p = .01), and less likely to rupture intraoperatively (OR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.11–0.73, p = .01). No variables were associated with rupture in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Superotemporal dermoid cysts are common in the pediatric population, less likely to have orbital extension, undergo imaging, and have intraoperative rupture when compared to other locations in the orbit.

Acknowledgments

This study was exempt from institutional review board approval as patients were deidentified throughout the chart review. All authors have viewed and agreed to the submission.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.