Factors associated with appointment ‘no-shows’ at two tertiary level outpatient oculoplastic clinics

ABSTRACT

Purpose

Appointment no-shows in clinics can adversely impact patients and physicians alike. This study aimed to determine the rate and potential causes of missed appointments in oculoplastic clinics and compare a private practice and hospital-based academic setting.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who booked appointments for oculoplastic consultation, between August 2019 and January 2020 at two oculoplastic clinics was performed. Demographic and patient-specific characteristics of patients who failed to attend their appointment were identified. Data were analysed to determine and compare the no-show rates in both clinics and logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with them.

Results

The rate of missed appointments was 3% and 17% at the oculoplastic clinics of Lions Eye Institute (LEI, private practice) and Albany Medical Center (AMC, academic hospital-based office), respectively. Patients at the AMC clinic were more likely to be male, younger, have a lower household income, not carry private insurance, and suffer from trauma. Logistic regression analysis showed lower patient age to significantly increase the likelihood of no-shows in both clinics (p = .01 for LEI, p = .003 for AMC), and lead appointment time greater than 90 days to be a significant risk factor for no-shows at LEI (p = .01).

Conclusions

The no-show rate for oculoplastic appointments is 3% and 17% at LEI and AMC clinics, respectively. Our analysis shows that younger patients are more likely to miss appointments at both clinics, and an appointment lead time greater than 90 days is a significant risk factor for no-shows at LEI.

KEYWORDS:

• No-shows
• oculoplastic clinic
• missed appointments
• appointment lead time

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the article.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.