92
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Yield and protein content of barley as affected by release rate of coated urea and rate of nitrogen application

, , &
Pages 401-412 | Published online: 21 Nov 2008
 

Abstract

Coated urea consists of a urea core and a polymer coating. It meters out urea over a period of time. In the market place, price is favorable for high protein content feed barley. The objectives of this study were to determine release rate of urea from coated urea products and relative effectiveness of urea, coated urea or a mixture of coated urea products with different release rates in increasing yield and protein content of barley. Release rate of coated urea Mini I (quick release) and Mini II (slow release) in water was determined at 23°C by recovering ten pre‐weighed granules from 500 mL water at 6 h, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 days. The recovered granules were dried and then weighed. Barley (Hordium vulgare L. cv. Duke) was grown in potted soil (2 L) at 15°C for 90 days in a growth chamber with treatments of Nil, non‐coated urea, Mini I, Mini II, Mixture I (1/3 urea+1/3 Mini I+1/3 Mini II) and Mixture II (1/5 urea+2/ 5 Mini I+2/5 Mini II). The nitrogen (N) application rates were 100, 200 and 300 kg N ha‐1. Above‐ground plant samples were taken at 22, 44, 66, and 90 (maturity) days after seeding, and dry matter mass per pot and N content of the plant samples were determined. The release of urea from Mini I and Mini II followed a lognomial pattern. Increasing N application rate increased dry matter yield of barley. Dry matter yield from urea tended to be higher than other treatments at each rate of N application, but that did not couple with high grain protein content. At 100 kg N ha‐1, there was no post anthesis N assimilation (PANA) for urea and Mini I, but there were 4, 14, and 13% PANA for Mini II, Mixture I, and Mixture II, respectively. However, when N application rate was increased to 200 and 300 kg N ha‐1, there was PANA even for urea treatment. Protein content of barley grain was higher with coated urea or mixture treatments than with urea at each rate of N application. The potential N loss (i.e., difference between percentN released from fertilizers and percent fertilizer N recovered by barley) was Mini II<Mini I<Mixture II<Mixture I for the same N application rate, and was 100<200<300 kg N ha‐1 for the same fertilizer treatment. In conclusion, at a limited N application rate, coated urea with a slow release rate or a combination of two coated urea products (quick and slow release) with urea increased grain protein content of barley. The potential N loss was less with coated urea applied alone than with a mixture of coated urea and urea.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.