143
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Enhance Tolerance of Rosa multiflora cv. Burr to Bicarbonate in Irrigation Water

, &
Pages 1517-1540 | Received 26 Jul 2007, Accepted 15 Mar 2007, Published online: 17 Sep 2007
 

ABSTRACT

High bicarbonate (HCO3 ) of irrigation water can be detrimental to plant growth in sustainable horticultural production systems. The ability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), ZAC-19, (composed of Glomus albidum, Glomus claroideum, and Glomus diaphanum) to enhance tolerance to HCO3 was tested on Rosa multiflora cv. Burr. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonized and non-inoculated (non-AMF) plants were treated with 0, 2.5, 5, and 10 mM HCO3 . Increasing HCO3 concentration and associated high pH and electrical conductivity (EC)—reduced plant growth, nutrient uptake, and acid phosphatase activity, while increasing alkaline phosphatase activity (ALP). Inoculation with AMF enhanced plant tolerance to HCO3 , as indicated by greater growth (leaf, stem, and total plant dry weight, leaf area and leaf area ratio), leaf elemental concentration [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), aluminum (Al), boron (B)], leaf chlorophyll concentration, higher mycorrhizal inoculation effect, lower root Fe reductase activity, and generally lower soluble ALP activity. While AMF colonization was reduced by increasing HCO3 concentration, colonization still occurred at high HCO3 concentration. At 2.5 mM HCO3 , AMF plant growth was comparable to plants at 0 mM HCO3 , further indicating the beneficial effect of AMF for alleviation of HCO3 plant stress.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We gratefully appreciate the technical assistance of Dr. Chuanjiu He, Matt Kent, Paul Greer, and Donita Bryan. We thank Dr. D.W. Reed, Dr. H.B. Pemberton, and two anonymous reviewers for critical review of the manuscript.

Notes

z Mycorrhizal inoculation effect [MIE (%) = (total DW of AMF plant-total DW of non-AMF plant)/(total DW of non-AMF plant)− 1 × 100].

y Means ± SE, (n = 9).

x Significance according to ANOVA, NS, ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, nonsignificant and significant P ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.

z Specific leaf area [leaf area (cm2)]/[leaf DW (g− 1)].

y Leaf area ratio [leaf area (cm2)]/[plant DW (g− 1)].

x Means ± SE (n = 9).

w Significance according to ANOVA, NS, ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, nonsignificant and significant P ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.

z Means ± SE, (n = 3).

z Means ± SE, (n = 3).

z Means ± standard error (n = 3, 675 observations per treatment from 225 1-cm root segments).

y Significance according to ANOVA, NS, ∗, ∗∗, ∗∗∗, nonsignificant and significant P ≤ 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, respectively.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.