317
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Influence of Additional Micronutrient Supply on Growth, Nutritional Status and Flower Quality of Three Rose Cultivars in a Soilless Culture

, , &
Pages 1543-1554 | Received 01 May 2007, Accepted 29 Feb 2008, Published online: 05 Aug 2008
 

ABSTRACT

The effect of additional supply of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), manganese (Mn), and copper (Cu) on three rose cultivars was investigated. Five fertilizer treatments were utilized: 0 (control), 150 μ mol Fe L− 1, 150 μ mol Fe + 10 μ mol Mn L− 1, 150 μ mol Fe + 10 μ mol Mn + 12 μ mol Zn L− 1, 150 μ mol Fe + 10 μ mol Mn + 12 μ mol Zn + 5 μ mol Cu L− 1. The results demonstrated significant variation among rose cultivars in developing Zn, Fe, and Mn deficiency symptoms and response to micronutrient supplies. For ‘Modern Girl’ and ‘Orange Juice’, all micronutrient treatments resulted in higher stem length and thickness as compared to the control. No significant increase in stem length was observed in ‘Aqua Fresh’. All cultivars had the greatest flower vase life in the added Zn treatments. All fertilizer treatments significantly increased Fe concentration in the leaves of ‘Modern Girl’ and ‘Aqua Fresh’ as compared to the control. The Fe-Mn-Zn-Cu treatment significantly increased leaf concentration of Mn, Zn, and Cu in all cultivars. Leaf sodium (Na) concentration was lower in the micronutrient treatments that included Zn addition as compared to the treatments that did not include added Zn. No visible mildew symptom was observed in the treatments with Zn addition. The results showed that genotypic variation and sufficient micronutrient supply are two key factors in success production of rose in the soilless culture. Furthermore, the results indicated the importance of Zn in enhancing the quality of the rose flower.

Notes

∗Values with the same letter within each column and for each cultivar are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

∗Values with the same letter within each column and for each cultivar are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

ast;Values with the same letter within each column and for each cultivar are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05.

∗∗ 0 to 5: 0, no visible mildew; 1, 0–1%; 2, 2–5%; 3, 6–10% and 4, > 20% infected leaf area.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.