158
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Analysis and use of cumulative nutrient uptake formulas in plant nutrition and the temporal-weight-averaged influx

, &
Pages 2511-2520 | Received 02 Nov 2015, Accepted 13 Sep 2016, Published online: 06 Sep 2017
 

ABSTRACT

A generalized cumulative uptake formula of nutrient uptake by roots following our previous formula (Reginato-Tarzia, Comm. Soil Sci. and Plant., 33 (Citation2002), 821-830) is developed. Cumulative nutrient uptake obtained by this formula is compared with the simulated results obtained by the Claassen and Barber (Claassen and Barber, Agronomy J., 68 (Citation1976) 961–964) and Cushman (Cushman, Soil Sci. Soc., 43 (Citation1979) 1087–1090) formulas. A mass balance is analyzed for the three formulas of cumulative nutrient uptake in order to decide which of them is correct. Moreover, the mass balance is also verified through a computational algorithm using data obtained from literature, and we compute the potassium (K) uptake for maize for low and high soil concentrations using the three mentioned formulas. The theoretical analysis shows that Claassen and Barber, and Cushman formulas do not verify, in general, the mass balance condition. The Claassen and Barber formula only verifies this condition when the influx is constant and root grows linearly. The Cushman formula verifies the mass balance when the influx is constant regardless of the law of root growth. Reginato and Tarzia formula always verifies the mass balance whatever be the representative functions for the influx and the law of root growth. Moreover, we propose a redefinition of the averaged influx from which the Williams formula (Williams, J. Scientific Res., 1 (Citation1948) 333–361) can be deduced. We remark that Williams formula is a consequence of our definition of temporal-weight-averaged influx for all root growth law expressions. Also, we present a comparison of influx and cumulative uptake of cadmium (Cd) with data extracted from literature. Cumulative uptake is obtained through the Barber–Cushman model and our moving boundary model by using the redefinition of averaged influx on root surface and the correct cumulative uptake formula presented in this paper.

Funding

This paper was partially sponsored by the project PIP No. 0534 of CONICET - UA (Rosario, Argentina) and SECYT - UNRC No. 18/C427 (Río Cuarto, Argentina).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.