413
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of nitrogen sources on the yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in western Kenya

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1652-1661 | Received 31 Jan 2017, Accepted 15 Feb 2018, Published online: 15 May 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Depletion of soil nutrients due to continuous cultivation without adequate external fertilization is one of the challenges facing many smallholder farmers in western Kenya. This study was conducted to assess the effects of organic (water hyacinth compost), inorganic (urea) nitrogen (N) sources, and commercial Rhizobia inoculant on the yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) for two consecutive seasons in the short rains (2013) and long rains (2014). The experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design and replicated four times. Triple superphosphate was applied to all treatments except those with compost to ensure that the soil had adequate phosphorus (P). Yellow and Rose coco bean varieties grown with urea and inoculated with commercial Rhizobia inoculant gave significantly higher yield of 382 kg ha−1 and 341 kg ha−1, respectively in the short rains (SR) season. In the long rains (LR) season bean yield was high in water hyacinth compost (1526 kg ha−1) and control with non-limiting P (1300 kg ha−1) treatments. Commercial Rhizobia inoculant did not significantly increase in yield in the SR and LR seasons. There was no significant influence on soil properties after two seasons of continuous cultivation of common bean and application of organic and inorganic fertilizers. These results demonstrate that water hyacinth compost improved bean yield in the LR season. However, longer field testing and economic analysis are required for it to be recommended as a substitute for inorganic N source among smallholder farmers.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the field assistants in Kisumu and Kakamega for their support during this study. Smallholder farmers along the Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya are further acknowledged for providing free access into their farms.

Additional information

Funding

The study was supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and the Inter-University Council for East Africa (IUCEA) through the Lake Victoria Research Initiative (VicRes), National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI), the Ørskov Foundation (Scotland, UK), and Association of African Universities (AAU) Small Grants for Theses and Dissertations Programme.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.